From bill.mandel@unistudios.com Fri Apr 20 14:50:58 2001
Received: from usushntex51.unistudios.com (outmail.unistudios.com [192.251.67.111])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f3KIovn12156
for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:50:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from usintex10lax.udh.unistudios.com (USINTEX10LAX [167.167.130.69]) by usushntex51.unistudios.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
id J21VY02R; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:50:37 -0700
Received: by USINTEX10LAX with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:50:57 -0700
Message-ID:
From: "Mandel, Bill"
To: "'technotes@lists.m4if.org'"
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:50:47 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] FW: [M4IF Infolist] MPEG-4 and MHP and SMIL?
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
(moved over)
This has been an interesting thread. Are we seeing a divergence of specs with similar user experience goals? I'd like to hear some comments comparing how user experiences/apps are developed in addition to how the various formats overlap.
Technology Implementation/Authoring Timeframe
MHP Java or (Bean Tool?) Today?
MPEG4 Scripting (BIFS Tool?) <1 year
SMIL2.0 Handcoding or Tool Ongoing
Flash Authoring Tool Ongoing
DHTML/ActiveX Handcoding? Ongoing
Are there comparison(s) to be made between BIFS and SMIL?
Regards,
Bill Mandel
From ayerkes@gmvnetwork.com Fri Apr 27 22:15:23 2001
Received: from mail.genxnet.com (mail.genxnet.com [216.214.194.215])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f3S2FN612069
for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 22:15:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gmvnetwork.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.genxnet.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f3S2FIN07956
for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 21:15:18 -0500
Message-Id: <200104280215.f3S2FIN07956@mail.genxnet.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 02:15:18 -0000
To:
From: "Art Yerkes"
X-Mailer: TWIG 2.6.2
X-Client-IP: 216.214.221.177
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 0.7 (http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang/)
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] DMIF and uuData
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hello all,
We have implemented a DMIF instance (apart from any comittee sources)
that we believe is commercially viable. It's a C API that uses an XML
configuration. The DMIF specification makes it possible to write such
an API enabling applications to stream MPEG-4 without knowing about
transports or protocols. It has gone well. We have written some
sample code with it, and it fully complies with DMIF. The development
of DMIF represents significant change in the design of media
infrstructure when it becomes mainstream, because it allows a
beautiful sharing of code between applications. I am confident that,
IP issues aside, DMIF will become the preeminent API for writing
streaming apps, because it provides an amicable divorce between code
that implements transport and code that implements the 'value',
presentation, player, IPMP, and other code.
However, I noticed one thing that makes DMIF more complicated to
adhere to if you don't know what application your DMIF instance will
be communicating with. In our case, our DMIF is meant to be sold as a
component. Perhaps no-one else plans to do this, but we wanted to
mention our problem in hopes that someone else may benefit from
sharing experience about this matter. I propose a problem and one
possible solution. I am interested in hearing comments both about our
view of this problem and our intended solution.
The problem as I see it is that uuData in it's many forms throughout
the specification of the DMIF Application interface is only opaque
data. Even though this data is meant for interpretation by the
application and not by DMIF, conforming applications eventually need
to settle on a form for this data both to prevent misinterpretation by
incompatible DMIF applications which implement the same protocol, and
to facilitate good communication between DMIF applications that are
meant to be compatible. I have several reasons for thinking this:
1) A vendor may wish to implement a DMIF service layer (part of a
"peer application," running on the same computer that reads a certain
filetype and delivers data to the DAI layer of the calling
application. The generaic service provider needs a way to interface
with potentially many Originating DMIF peer applications.
2) In 14496-6.10.4.1, it is specified that the DMIF user 'might'
provide additional information such as client credentials in uuData.
A media-unaware transport agent (such as a firewall tunnel or similar)
may need to check credentials before admission to the firewalled
environment. This necessitates an application independent method at
least for credentials signalling. In HTTP and RTSP, this is handled
with a WWW-Authenticate response-header, which allows any HTTP-enabled
application to interact in a seamless manner with different
authentication systems of which it is aware. This does not limit
application freedom very much. Vendors still have the opportunity to
use any available authentication mechanism (nothing is specified about
what mechanism to use), it simply allows the mechanism and it's
associated data to be clearly identified.
3) In 14496-6.10.4.5, the uuDataIn field provides information about
the channels requested. This information is important when individual
elementary streams contain different parts of a presentation. An
example of this would be a presentation containing several JFIF images
connected by hyperlinks, such as the menu system for a kiosk.
Although this information is "opaque to the delivery layer", it is not
opaque to the remote DMIF application. Again, an identification of
what data has been sent should also be sent in a standard form,
probably a MIME type preceeding the data. Again, This is not too much
to ask, and provides the benefit of letting the peer DMIF application
know what to expect. Even better would be the specification of a
requested ES_ID form and position. This would allow (for example) a
disk DMIF instance to correctly identify a requested elementary stream
in a uniform way. It would also allow two DMIF peers made by
different companies to dicuss a specific elementary stream, even if
they were not 'born' compatible.
4) In 14496-6.10.4.6, the specification states that the ES_ID may be
present in the return uuData. It's presence and form (2 bytes,
network byte order?) should be specified, as well as where it can be
found in the uuData should be specified. This makes it possible for
an application to silently ignore most of the opaque data that it
doesn't understand, but still retrieve the ES_ID.
5) In 14496-6.10.4.9, as with the other uuData fields, this one
carries no indication of it's contents. The problem here is that both
a local DMIF scenario, and a remote instance have need of the
information contained therein. This field has been implemented as
four-byte little endian integers and as text strings. It would be
nice to get an indication of the control scheme in use. An 'integer'
scheme would not be pleased to get the string 'PLAY\0' and likewise, a
DMIF peer implemented to expect null terminated strings would be
imperiled by the reception of '\010TEARDOWN' (a string with the length
information in front).
While one might envision several solutions, I would propose that uuData
objects follow HTTP style rules:
At least a 'Content-Type: ...' header must be present before any data,
but any number of response headers are allowed. Response headers are
terminated by a blank line. Any data, binary, ASCII, opaque or
otherwise may follow. The Content-Length header is never needed in
this scenario because the length of the object is specified in the
DMIF primitive itself. The payload part of the Content-Type header
should be a textural MIME type.
I also propose that the HTTP style WWW-Authenticate scheme be used in
the ServiceAttach and ServiceDetach (when attachment is denied).
I further propose that ES_ID, when present, shall be sent among the
headers as mpeg4-esid, or mpeg4-esids if there are multiples (as
sugguested in the draft-singer-mpeg4-ip-02 IETF draft.
I wanted to gather comments and see if anyone else is like minded.
Perhaps, this type of discussion can be the basis for either a formal
or informal rule with regard to those pesky opaque bytes.
References
Title: A Framework for the delivery of MPEG-4 over IP-based Protocols
Authors: D. Singer, Y Lim
URL:
http://www.ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/internet-drafts/draft-singer-mpeg4-ip-02.txt
Title: Real Time Streaming Protocol
Authors: H. Schulzrinne
URL: http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/Orig/rfc2326.txt
Title: Hypertext Transfer Protocol
Authors: R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J Mogul, H. Frystyk, L. Masinter, P. Leach,
T. Berners-Lee
URL: http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/Orig/rfc2616.txt
Art Yerkes
Chief Software Architect
GMV Network
--
HTTP_TRACE( "RTSPSession has died of snarfage.\n" )
-- Anonymous C source file
#define SS_USR 6 /* The user is broken */
-- Anonymous Header File
From LMing@tvia.com Tue May 1 20:47:55 2001
Received: from sanjose.tvia.com (66-2-124-157.customer.algx.net [66.2.124.157])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f420lsX25249
for ; Tue, 1 May 2001 20:47:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sanjose.tvia.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 17:44:13 -0700
Message-ID:
From: Lei Ming
To: "'technotes@lists.m4if.org'"
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 17:44:11 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] help
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi, All,
I have a question about the scalability in MPEG4. If "ref_select_code" is 1.
What are
the reference Vops (backward + forward) for enhancement Vops in the
following
example?
I B P B P B
base | | | | | |
-------------------------------------
enh | | | | |
P B B B B
Regards,
Lei
----------------------------------
Lei Ming
Tvia Inc.
(408)982-8588 ext. 162
From axel.binder@philips.com Mon May 7 22:52:02 2001
Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f482q1t11474
for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 22:52:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1])
by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id EAA12313
for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:52:00 +0200 (MEST)
(envelope-from axel.binder@philips.com)
From: axel.binder@philips.com
Received: from smtprelay-eur1.philips.com(130.139.36.3) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a)
id xma012311; Tue, 8 May 01 04:52:00 +0200
Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10])
by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id EAA02743
for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:52:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from EMLMS01.DIAMOND.PHILIPS.COM (emlms01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.213])
by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id EAA24346
for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:51:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by EMLMS01.DIAMOND.PHILIPS.COM (Soft-Switch LMS 4.0) with snapi
via EMEA1 id 0056900017783826; Tue, 8 May 2001 05:04:44 +0200
To:
Message-ID: <0056900017783826000002L062*@MHS>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 05:04:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name="MEMO 05/08/01 04:51:48"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx3.magma.ca id f482q1t11474
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] gray shapes
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi together,
there is a filter defined for subsampling binary shapes when they are applied to
chrominance planes. Is there a similar filter defined for gray shapes?
Take the average, take the maximum alpha, ...?
regards
axel binder
=====================================================
Axel Binder Philips Starnberg
Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17
D-82319 Starnberg
phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany
fax: +49 8151 270 200
mobile: +49 172 92 18 623
e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com
=====================================================
From ramki@emuzed.com Tue May 15 10:38:53 2001
Received: from emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com (emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com [161.58.152.119])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f4FEcrM16163
for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 10:38:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ramki ([202.9.170.21]) by emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com (8.11.2) id f4FEcgt96931; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:38:43 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <01e001c0dd4c$bd68d130$0d0aa8c0@blr.emuzed.com>
From: "Ramkishor Korada"
To:
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 20:08:33 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C0DD7A.D12FE720"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4/H.263 Test Sequences!
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C0DD7A.D12FE720
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I am looking for MPEG-4/H.263 test sequences of CIF/SIF size at a frame =
rate of 25/30.=20
Can some one suggest the URLs from where these sequences can be =
downloaded?
Thanks in advance,
regards,
ramkishor
Architect - Video
Multimedia Technologies Division
Emuzed Bangalore Division
IndiraNagar,Bangalore
www.emuzed.com
------=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C0DD7A.D12FE720
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I am looking for MPEG-4/H.263 =
test sequences=20
of CIF/SIF size at a frame rate of 25/30.
Can some one suggest the URLs from =
where these=20
sequences can be downloaded?
Thanks in advance,
regards,
ramkishor
Architect - Video
Multimedia =
Technologies=20
Division
Emuzed Bangalore Division
IndiraNagar,Bangalore
www.emuzed.com
=
------=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C0DD7A.D12FE720--
From garysull@microsoft.com Tue May 15 11:50:54 2001
Received: from mail2.microsoft.com (mail2.microsoft.com [131.107.3.124])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f4FFosM22108
for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 11:50:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 157.54.9.104 by mail2.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 15 May 2001 08:47:18 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Received: from red-msg-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.70]) by inet-imc-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2883);
Tue, 15 May 2001 08:47:13 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4688.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0DD56.4F37D84B"
Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4/H.263 Test Sequences!
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 08:47:13 -0700
Message-ID: <0170DDAD0BADFA4CBEC3B55A0748DCCC02C2409D@red-msg-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4/H.263 Test Sequences!
Thread-Index: AcDdTQLT9470rg4IRaGsxwQZrENDiAAB65bQ
From: "Gary Sullivan"
To: "Ramkishor Korada" ,
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2001 15:47:13.0700 (UTC) FILETIME=[4F7EA640:01C0DD56]
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0DD56.4F37D84B
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You can get some of them from
http://standard.pictel.com/ftp/video-site/sequences
and some from http://kbs.cs.tu-berlin.de/~stewe/vceg/sequences.htm
=20
Best Regards,
=20
-Gary Sullivan
-----Original Message-----
From: Ramkishor Korada [mailto:ramki@emuzed.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:39 AM
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4/H.263 Test Sequences!
Hi,
I am looking for MPEG-4/H.263 test sequences of CIF/SIF size at a frame
rate of 25/30.=20
=20
Can some one suggest the URLs from where these sequences can be
downloaded?
=20
Thanks in advance,
regards,
ramkishor
=20
Architect - Video
Multimedia Technologies Division
Emuzed Bangalore Division
IndiraNagar,Bangalore
www.emuzed.com
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0DD56.4F37D84B
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Best=20
Regards,
-Gary=20
Sullivan
Hi,
I am looking for MPEG-4/H.263 =
test=20
sequences of CIF/SIF size at a frame rate of 25/30.
Can some one suggest the URLs from =
where these=20
sequences can be downloaded?
Thanks in advance,
regards,
ramkishor
Architect - Video
Multimedia =
Technologies=20
Division
Emuzed Bangalore Division
IndiraNagar,Bangalore
www.emuzed.com
<=
/FONT>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0DD56.4F37D84B--
From mikael.reichel@culinaire.se Wed May 23 12:14:18 2001
Received: from algonet.se (garibaldi.tninet.se [195.100.94.103])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f4NGEHF00098
for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:14:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 266p2 (sdu165-242.ppp.algonet.se [195.163.242.165])
by garibaldi.tninet.se (BLUETAIL Mail Robustifier 2.2.2) with ESMTP
id 136230.634455.990garibaldi-s0 for
; Wed, 23 May 2001 18:14:15 +0200
Message-ID: <044901c0e3a3$fa149080$ef4ca3c3@266p2>
From: "Mikael Reichel"
To: "MPEG4 Org list"
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 18:07:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_042F_01C0E3B3.4D0CA7A0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Watkinson MPEG4 seminar in June, Switzerland
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_042F_01C0E3B3.4D0CA7A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All!=20
F.Y.I John Watkinson is holding his two-day MPEG4 technical seminar on =
June 18-19 in Vevey, Switzerland.=20
This event is just prior to the MITIL conference/show running on to the =
20-23 of June. Special package offer available.
=20
For full details, downloads etc on the MPEG for seminar please visit =
www.culinaire.se=20
=20
Alternatively mail me and I will send you the required information and =
registration forms.
Should you not be able to attend the event but interested to do so when =
and if offered closer to you, let me know as the level of interest has =
direct bearing on us setting this up.
John=B4s book on MPEG4 is being printed now and released in September. =
Publisher is, as usual, Focal Press.
Kind regards
Mikael.Reichel@culinaire.se=20
John Watkinson & Associates
_________________________________________________________________
"I do not distinguish by the eye but by the mind which is the proper =
judge of man",=20
Seneca. 8 B.C.- 65 A.D.
"I know but one freedom & that is the freedom of the mind" -- Antoine de =
Saint-Exupery
"The future of television is the Internet" Mike 1993 A.D.
"Knowledge is not knowledge until someone else knows you know" Lucilius =
124 B.C
"A cynic is what people who can=B4t see whats coming is calling those =
that can" Watkinson 01
Phone/fax/voicemail +46-(0)8-541 31500 Mobile +46(0)708-541792
Address; Ytterbystrand 6, S-185 94 Vaxholm, SWEDEN
_________________________________________________________________
------=_NextPart_000_042F_01C0E3B3.4D0CA7A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All!
F.Y.I John Watkinson is holding his two-day MPEG4 =
technical=20
seminar on June 18-19 in Vevey, Switzerland.
This event is just =
prior to the=20
MITIL conference/show running on to =
the 20-23=20
of June. Special package offer available.
For full details, =
downloads etc on the MPEG for seminar please visit
www.culinaire.se =
Alternatively=20
mail me and I will send you the required information and registration=20
forms.
Should you not be able to attend the event =
but interested to do=20
so when and if offered closer to you, let me know as the level of =
interest=20
has direct bearing on us setting this up.
John=B4s book on MPEG4 is being printed now and released in =
September.=20
Publisher is, as usual, Focal Press.
------=_NextPart_000_042F_01C0E3B3.4D0CA7A0--
From lcheng61@hotmail.com Wed May 30 18:54:08 2001
Received: from hotmail.com (f75.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.75])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f4UMs7J26649
for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 18:54:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Wed, 30 May 2001 15:54:01 -0700
Received: from 128.200.38.161 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 30 May 2001 22:54:01 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [128.200.38.161]
From: "Liang Cheng"
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 06:54:01 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Message-ID:
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2001 22:54:01.0911 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B5FCC70:01C0E95B]
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] help about 14496-1 version 2
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Dear all,
Now we met a trouble when we studied the interactivities between MPEG-4 node and human. We are unfortunately using 14496-1:1999(E) Date 1998-12-18, and the serial number of this document is N2501. Obviously, it is MPEG-4 system on version 1.
We just heard the version 2 has already come up and it includes more advanced user interaction function. We look forward to obtaining it. Can someone of you tell me where we can buy the MPEG-4 standard serials in version 2? We will be appreciate it if you may help us.
Liang
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
From rkoenen@intertrust.com Fri Jun 1 02:43:50 2001
Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.163.3])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f516hnM03033
for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 02:43:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id XAA16272 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 23:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown(198.3.162.27) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (V5.5)
id xma016139; Thu, 31 May 01 23:43:25 -0700
Received: from exchange.epr.com (exchange.epr.com [198.3.162.249])
by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA18257;
Thu, 31 May 2001 23:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by exchange.epr.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 23:41:56 -0700
Message-ID: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B032BC97F@exchange.epr.com>
From: Rob Koenen
To: Liang Cheng , technotes@lists.m4if.org
Cc: "Olivier Avaro (E-mail 2)"
Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] help about 14496-1 version 2
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 23:41:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0EA65.F261B520"
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0EA65.F261B520
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?ICS1=35&ICS2=40
&ICS3=0&CSNUMBER=24462
links to 14496-1:1999 - the 1999 version of MPEG-4 Systems
Olivier, does that include Version 2?
If not, when will the 2000 edition be available from ISO?
Thanks,
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Liang Cheng [mailto:lcheng61@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 May, 2001 15:54
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] help about 14496-1 version 2
Dear all,
Now we met a trouble when we studied the interactivities between MPEG-4 node
and human. We are unfortunately using 14496-1:1999(E) Date 1998-12-18, and
the serial number of this document is N2501. Obviously, it is MPEG-4 system
on version 1.
We just heard the version 2 has already come up and it includes more
advanced user interaction function. We look forward to obtaining it. Can
someone of you tell me where we can buy the MPEG-4 standard serials in
version 2? We will be appreciate it if you may help us.
Liang
_____
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
.
_______________________________________________ Technotes mailing list
Technotes@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0EA65.F261B520
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
links=20
to 14496-1:1999 - the 1999 version of MPEG-4 =
Systems
Olivier, does that include Version 2?
If=20
not, when will the 2000 edition be available from =
ISO?
Thanks,
Rob
Dear all,
Now we met a trouble when we studied the interactivities between =
MPEG-4=20
node and human. We are unfortunately using 14496-1:1999(E) Date =
1998-12-18, and the serial number of this document is N2501. =
Obviously,=20
it is MPEG-4 system on version 1.
We just heard the version 2 has already come up and it includes =
more=20
advanced user interaction function. We look forward to =
obtaining=20
it. Can someone of you tell me where we can buy the MPEG-4 =
standard=20
serials in version 2? We will be appreciate it if you may help =
us.
Liang
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
_______________________________________________ Technotes =
mailing list=20
Technotes@lists.m4if.org=20
http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0EA65.F261B520--
From olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com Sat Jun 2 20:03:44 2001
Received: from prserv.net (out1.prserv.net [32.97.166.31])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5303hC19807
for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 20:03:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rptw2kavaro (slip32-106-67-11.mlv.fr.prserv.net[32.106.67.11])
by prserv.net (out1) with SMTP
id <2001060300034020100hsg7ce>; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 00:03:41 +0000
Reply-To:
From: "AVARO Olivier FTRD/DIH"
To: "'Rob Koenen'" ,
"'Liang Cheng'" ,
Cc: "'Olivier Avaro \(E-mail 2\)'"
Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] help about 14496-1 version 2
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 01:31:59 +0200
Message-ID: <000a01c0ebc0$e197bd00$0b436a20@rptw2kavaro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C0EBD1.A5208D00"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-Reply-To: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B032BC97F@exchange.epr.com>
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
C'est un message de format MIME en plusieurs parties.
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C0EBD1.A5208D00
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi all,
Olivier, does that include Version 2?
Yes.
If not, when will the 2000 edition be available from ISO?
First, it's not 2000 but 2001.
The ISO secretariat is waiting for the proof of 14496-1:2001 from ITTF.
So it should be here soon.
cu,
O.
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C0EBD1.A5208D00
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
Olivier, does that include Version 2?
Yes.
If not, when will the 2000 edition be available from =
ISO?
First, it's not 2000 but=20
2001.
The ISO secretariat is=20
waiting for the proof of =
14496-1:2001 from=20
ITTF.
So it should =
be here=20
soon.
cu,
O.
=
<=
/BODY>
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C0EBD1.A5208D00--
From Jeyur.Patel@Mysoremail.ltitl.com Mon Jun 4 03:02:55 2001
Received: from ltitlrelay.ltitl.com ([203.199.54.28])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5472pC09373
for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 03:02:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Mysoremail.ltitl.com ([172.25.26.2])
by ltitlrelay.ltitl.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.5)
with SMTP id 2001060412314872:15289 ;
Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:31:48 +0530
Received: by Mysoremail.ltitl.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 65256A61.00267813 ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:30:11 +0530
X-Lotus-FromDomain: MYSORE
From: Jeyur.Patel@Mysoremail.ltitl.com
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Message-ID: <65256A61.0026776F.00@Mysoremail.ltitl.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:30:08 +0530
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on ltitlrelay/Ltitl(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at
06/04/2001 12:31:51 PM,
Serialize by Router on ltitlrelay/Ltitl(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at
06/04/2001 12:32:03 PM,
Serialize complete at 06/04/2001 12:32:03 PM
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Doubt
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Dear all,
We have a basic doubt about MPEG-4 visual encoder and decoder Verification Model
Software.
We have got two Reference software for MPEG-4 visual natural CODECs, supplied
with MPEG-4 standard ISO/IEC 14496-5, one is implementation of MPEG-4 visual
natural encoder & decoder in 'ANSI C' and other is implementation of same in
C++.
We would like to know the Visual Profile and Level implementated in these
Reference Software.
Does it support Visual Simple Profile @ Level 3 ?
Regards,
Jeyur
From rudinei@icmc.sc.usp.br Mon Jun 4 13:22:27 2001
Received: from taba2.icmc.sc.usp.br (taba2.icmc.sc.usp.br [143.107.231.16])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f54HMQC08065
for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from icmc.sc.usp.br (terereh.intermidia.icmc.sc.usp.br [143.107.231.201])
by taba2.icmc.sc.usp.br (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f54HMi006844
for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 14:22:44 -0300 (EST)
Message-ID: <3B1BC435.C814985@icmc.sc.usp.br>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 14:24:05 -0300
From: Rudinei Goularte
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi all!
I've tried to compile the IM1Player (core) released by ISO as the
MPEG-4 reference software at:
http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2489/Ittf_Home/PubliclyAvailableStandards.htm/
(look for 14496-5).
I'm using Microsoft Visual C ++ v. 5.0 under Windows 98.
The problem is that the compiler returns errors (see below). Fixing (I
think) some parts of the code I found that some methods are not
implemented. Is it true? I have to "fill in the blanks"? Or have ISO
relesead a wrong version?
Can someone help-me?
Thanks in advance.
Rudinei.
"
DMIFClientFilter.cpp
..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator
defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or
there is no acceptable conversion)
FlexDmux.cpp
..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator
defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or
there is no acceptable conversion)
MyChannel.cpp
..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator
defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or
there is no acceptable conversion)
Error executing cl.exe.
"
From jean-claude.dufourd@enst.fr Tue Jun 5 04:04:05 2001
Received: from enst.enst.fr (enst.enst.fr [137.194.2.16])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f55845C00809
for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 04:04:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from LISZT.enst.fr (liszt-fast.enst.fr [137.194.32.4])
by enst.enst.fr (Postfix) with SMTP
id B177F1C8D1; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:04:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from enst.fr (arctic.enst.fr) by LISZT.enst.fr (MX V4.2 AXP) with
SMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 10:03:59 MET_DST
Message-ID: <3B1C9326.A5F918A3@enst.fr>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 10:07:02 +0200
From: Jean-Claude Dufourd
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rudinei Goularte
Cc: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
References: <3B1BC435.C814985@icmc.sc.usp.br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Rudinei Goularte wrote:
> I'm using Microsoft Visual C ++ v. 5.0 under Windows 98.
I have used only VC++ 6 for a long time. I believe you have to use v6 to
compile the Systems reference software.
Best regards
JC
--
Jean-Claude Dufourd @======================================@
ENST, Dept COMELEC The wing, over the big rock...
46, rue Barrault @======================================@
75013 Paris Tel: +33145817807 Fax: +33145804036
From yossi@neomagic.co.il Tue Jun 5 09:01:08 2001
Received: from mail.neomagic.co.il (www.asp.co.il [194.90.249.195] (may be forged))
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f55D17C27653
for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:01:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neop12 ([194.90.249.100])
by mail.neomagic.co.il (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA28227
for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:39:52 +0300
From: "Yossi"
To:
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:02:11 +0200
Message-ID: <001601c0edc8$1e571700$64f95ac2@asp.co.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Method 1 Quantisation
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Sirs,
MPEG4 Video Verification Model (VM 16.0) presents two quantisation methods:
H263 and MPEG4 (pp. 61-63).
Section 3.4.4.2 describes Method 1 (H263), where Intra DC quantisation is
level = dc_coeff // 8
Section 3.4.5.1.1 describes Method 2 (MPEG4), where Intra DC quantisation is
level = dc_coeff//dc_scaler, where dc_scaler is a non-linear scaler based on
Qp.
However, Section 3.4.5.1.1 states, "Note: This section is valid for H.263
quantisation also."
Is the Intra DC quantisation method presented in Sec. 3.4.4.2 incorrect? In
particular, I am looking at the Simple Profile that allows only Method 1 for
quantization (see Table 9-1 in Part 2 of the MPEG4 Standard, page 201).
Should Intra DC quantisation for Simple Profile follow Section 3.4.4.2 or
Section 3.4.5.1.1?
Thank you,
Yossi Shain
NeoMagic Israel
From peterh@videospheres.com Tue Jun 5 09:26:49 2001
Received: from mx1.magmacom.com (mx1.magmacom.com [206.191.0.217])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f55DQnC00022
for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:26:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail3.magma.ca (mail3.magma.ca [206.191.0.221])
by mx1.magmacom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA21902;
Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:26:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from OREOV2 (gate.intouchsurvey.com [206.191.25.226])
by mail3.magma.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA19500;
Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:26:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Peter Haighton"
To: "Yossi" ,
Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] Method 1 Quantisation
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:27:44 -0400
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
In-Reply-To: <001601c0edc8$1e571700$64f95ac2@asp.co.il>
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi Yossi,
The standard states that
level = dc_coeff//dc_scaler but it also says that for
H.263 (short header=1) dc_scaler is always 8
so that means that both sections are correct.
Hope this helps
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
[mailto:technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org]On Behalf Of Yossi
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:02 AM
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Method 1 Quantisation
Sirs,
MPEG4 Video Verification Model (VM 16.0) presents two quantisation methods:
H263 and MPEG4 (pp. 61-63).
Section 3.4.4.2 describes Method 1 (H263), where Intra DC quantisation is
level = dc_coeff // 8
Section 3.4.5.1.1 describes Method 2 (MPEG4), where Intra DC quantisation is
level = dc_coeff//dc_scaler, where dc_scaler is a non-linear scaler based on
Qp.
However, Section 3.4.5.1.1 states, "Note: This section is valid for H.263
quantisation also."
Is the Intra DC quantisation method presented in Sec. 3.4.4.2 incorrect? In
particular, I am looking at the Simple Profile that allows only Method 1 for
quantization (see Table 9-1 in Part 2 of the MPEG4 Standard, page 201).
Should Intra DC quantisation for Simple Profile follow Section 3.4.4.2 or
Section 3.4.5.1.1?
Thank you,
Yossi Shain
NeoMagic Israel
_______________________________________________
Technotes mailing list
Technotes@lists.m4if.org
http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
From peterh@videospheres.com Tue Jun 5 11:32:52 2001
Received: from mx2.magma.ca (mx2.magma.ca [206.191.0.250])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f55FWqC12450
for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:32:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail3.magma.ca (mail3.magma.ca [206.191.0.221])
by mx2.magma.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA10646
for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:32:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from OREOV2 (gate.intouchsurvey.com [206.191.25.226])
by mail3.magma.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01418
for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:32:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Peter Haighton"
To:
Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:33:47 -0400
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Importance: Normal
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hello Rudinei,
Olivier Avaro forwarded your question to the implementation group
inside MPEG and here is the response that was received.
Hope this helps.
Thanks Olivier for your help.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-im1-sys@advent.ee.columbia.edu
[mailto:owner-im1-sys@advent.ee.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Wo Chang
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:25 AM
To: Franceschini Guido; olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com; Ref. Sys Im1
(E-mail)
Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
Dear Rudinei,
Guido is correct, you have to use VC6 in order to compile.
It is specially true for DMIFClientFilter since its .dsp
was generated by the earlier version of VCC (VC5).
Before compiling IM1Player via VC6, you need to disable
the DMIFClientFilter.dsp from READ-ONLY, so that VC6 can
generate DMIFClientFilter.dsp for VC6.
You also need to disable the READ-ONLY for the libs in
IM1Core\Lib since a new set of libs will be written into
this dir.
I think this will get you going with the compilation.
Have fun.
--Wo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Franceschini Guido"
To: ; "Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail)"
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:20 AM
Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
> The code released always compiled (with VC6), but I remember someone
having
> troubles using VC5.
> I suggest using VC6.
>
> Guido
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AVARO Olivier FTRD/DIH [mailto:olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:26 AM
> To: Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail)
> Subject: TR: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
>
>
>
> Can someone help ?
> cu,
> O.
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
> [mailto:technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org]De la part de Rudinei Goularte
> Envoye : lundi 4 juin 2001 19:24
> A : technotes@lists.m4if.org
> Objet : [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
>
>
> Hi all!
>
> I've tried to compile the IM1Player (core) released by ISO as the
> MPEG-4 reference software at:
>
http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2489/Ittf_Home/PubliclyAvai
> lableStandards.htm/
>
> (look for 14496-5).
>
> I'm using Microsoft Visual C ++ v. 5.0 under Windows 98.
>
> The problem is that the compiler returns errors (see below). Fixing (I
> think) some parts of the code I found that some methods are not
> implemented. Is it true? I have to "fill in the blanks"? Or have ISO
> relesead a wrong version?
> Can someone help-me?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Rudinei.
>
> "
> DMIFClientFilter.cpp
> ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator
> defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or
> there is no acceptable conversion)
> FlexDmux.cpp
> ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator
> defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or
> there is no acceptable conversion)
> MyChannel.cpp
> ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator
> defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or
> there is no acceptable conversion)
> Error executing cl.exe.
> "
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Technotes mailing list
> Technotes@lists.m4if.org
> http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
From pertti.lihavainen@hulikakku.suomi.net Wed Jun 6 14:59:03 2001
Received: from verkko.suomi.net (sun250-0-admin.suomi.net [212.50.140.140])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f56Ix2C19551
for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pertilihavainen (hulikakku9.suomi.net)
by verkko.suomi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.05.24.18.28.p7)
with SMTP id <0GEI00LI5VDO4X@verkko.suomi.net> for technotes@lists.m4if.org;
Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:58:37 +0300 (EET DST)
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 22:01:28 +0100
From: Pertti Lihavainen
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Message-id: <007801c0eecb$dbd7d220$090b000a@suomi.net>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000
X-Priority: 3
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Subscribing to Technotes
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Subscribing
Pertti Lihavainen
Koulukatu 32 D 56
90100 Oulu
Finland
pertti.lihavainen@hulikakku.suomi.net
From rkoenen@intertrust.com Thu Jun 7 19:28:53 2001
Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.163.3])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f57NSqC02714
for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:28:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id QAA04669 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown(198.3.162.27) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (V5.5)
id xma004580; Thu, 7 Jun 01 16:28:46 -0700
Received: from exchange.epr.com (exchange.epr.com [198.3.162.249])
by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12683;
Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by exchange.epr.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:27:08 -0700
Message-ID: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B032BD0F3@exchange.epr.com>
From: Rob Koenen
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Cc: Jeyur.Patel@Mysoremail.ltitl.com,
"Michael Wollborn (E-mail)"
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:27:03 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] re: doubt
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
-----Original Message-----
From: Wollborn Michael (FV/SLM) * [mailto:Michael.Wollborn@de.bosch.com]
Sent: Thursday, 07 June, 2001 5:41
To:
Cc: 'Rob Koenen'
Subject:
Dear Jeyur,
> We would like to know the Visual Profile and Level
> implementated in these
> Reference Software.
>
> Does it support Visual Simple Profile @ Level 3 ?
the version 1 Reference Software should support all profiles defined in the
version 1 of the Standard. Hence, regarding your question, it should also
support the Visual Simple Profile. With respect to levels things get more
complex, since the reference software was not designed to test conformance.
And since it is a software solution, some parameters defined in the level
may not apply. Therefore, I think the correct answer with this respect is
that you can not really say it supports a certain level, since that also
depends on the hardware used etc.
Hope this helps. If you have any further related question don't hesitate to
ask.
Best Regards,
Michael
_______________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Ing. Dipl.-Wirt.-Ing. Michael Wollborn
Robert Bosch GmbH Phone: +49 5121 49 5017
FV/SLM, PO Box 777777 Fax: +49 5121 49 17 5017
31132 Hildesheim Email: Michael.Wollborn@de.bosch.com
Germany http://www.tnt.uni-hannover.de/~wollborn
_______________________________________________________________________
"It follows that the Scientist, like the Pilgrim, must wend a straight
and narrow path between the Pitfalls of Oversimplification and the
Morass of Overcomplication" - Richard Bellman
_______________________________________________________________________
From rkoenen@intertrust.com Fri Jun 8 02:47:32 2001
Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.163.3])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f586lWC11764
for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 02:47:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id XAA00267 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown(198.3.162.27) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (V5.5)
id xma000161; Thu, 7 Jun 01 23:47:08 -0700
Received: from exchange.epr.com (exchange.epr.com [198.3.162.249])
by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA02781
for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by exchange.epr.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:45:31 -0700
Message-ID: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B032BD176@exchange.epr.com>
From: Rob Koenen
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: FW: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:45:21 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-im1-sys@advent.ee.columbia.edu
[mailto:owner-im1-sys@advent.ee.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Wo Chang
Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2001 8:25
To: Franceschini Guido; olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com; Ref. Sys Im1
(E-mail)
Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
Dear Rudinei,
Guido is correct, you have to use VC6 in order to compile.
It is specially true for DMIFClientFilter since its .dsp
was generated by the earlier version of VCC (VC5).
Before compiling IM1Player via VC6, you need to disable
the DMIFClientFilter.dsp from READ-ONLY, so that VC6 can
generate DMIFClientFilter.dsp for VC6.
You also need to disable the READ-ONLY for the libs in
IM1Core\Lib since a new set of libs will be written into
this dir.
I think this will get you going with the compilation.
Have fun.
--Wo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Franceschini Guido"
To: ; "Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail)"
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:20 AM
Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
> The code released always compiled (with VC6), but I remember someone
having
> troubles using VC5.
> I suggest using VC6.
>
> Guido
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AVARO Olivier FTRD/DIH [mailto:olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:26 AM
> To: Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail)
> Subject: TR: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
>
>
>
> Can someone help ?
> cu,
> O.
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
> [mailto:technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org]De la part de Rudinei Goularte
> Envoye : lundi 4 juin 2001 19:24
> A : technotes@lists.m4if.org
> Objet : [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software
>
>
> Hi all!
>
> I've tried to compile the IM1Player (core) released by ISO as the
> MPEG-4 reference software at:
>
http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2489/Ittf_Home/PubliclyAvai
> lableStandards.htm/
>
> (look for 14496-5).
>
> I'm using Microsoft Visual C ++ v. 5.0 under Windows 98.
>
> The problem is that the compiler returns errors (see below). Fixing (I
> think) some parts of the code I found that some methods are not
> implemented. Is it true? I have to "fill in the blanks"? Or have ISO
> relesead a wrong version?
> Can someone help-me?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Rudinei.
>
> "
> DMIFClientFilter.cpp
> ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator
> defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or
> there is no acceptable conversion)
> FlexDmux.cpp
> ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator
> defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or
> there is no acceptable conversion)
> MyChannel.cpp
> ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator
> defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or
> there is no acceptable conversion)
> Error executing cl.exe.
> "
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Technotes mailing list
> Technotes@lists.m4if.org
> http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
From Jani.Huoponen@hantro.com Mon Jun 11 00:21:05 2001
Received: from hantrodom5.hantro.com (h133.hantro.com [62.236.81.133] (may be forged))
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5B4L5C15374
for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:21:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by HANTRODOM5 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:18:29 +0300
Message-ID:
From: Jani Huoponen
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:18:21 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi all,
There seems to be one vague point in the Visual standard regarding the AC
prediction, I would like to have your opinion on the interpretation of the
standard.
So the question is:
What values are supposed to use in ac prediction if type of the prediction
block (block 'A' or block 'C') is not intra? Standard does not seem to
impose any restrictions on usage of inter blocks as ac predictor blocks but
video verification model seems to specify that they should be handled the
same way as blocks outside the VOP or video packet (i.e. use zero values as
predictors instead of actual inter block ac coefficient values).
BR, Jani
------------------------------------------------------------
Jani Huoponen
Engineering Manager, System Design
Hantro Products Oy
Nahkatehtaankatu 2, 90100 Oulu, Finland
+358-40-5272676
------------------------------------------------------------
From ramki@emuzed.com Mon Jun 11 08:21:50 2001
Received: from emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com (emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com [161.58.152.119])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5BCLoC28105
for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:21:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ramki ([202.9.170.21]) by emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com (8.11.2) id f5BCLi085335; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 06:21:45 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <035b01c0f270$fd67c870$0d0aa8c0@blr.emuzed.com>
From: "Ramkishor Korada"
To: "Jani Huoponen" ,
References:
Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:51:03 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi,
When the block is not Intra (Inter), then they should be handled the same
way as blocks outside VOP or packet i.e., use zero values as predictors.
warm regards,
ramkishor
Architect - Video
Digital Media Technology Division
Emuzed Bangalore Division
IndiraNagar,Bangalore
www.emuzed.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jani Huoponen"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:48 AM
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
> Hi all,
>
> There seems to be one vague point in the Visual standard regarding the AC
> prediction, I would like to have your opinion on the interpretation of the
> standard.
>
> So the question is:
>
> What values are supposed to use in ac prediction if type of the prediction
> block (block 'A' or block 'C') is not intra? Standard does not seem to
> impose any restrictions on usage of inter blocks as ac predictor blocks
but
> video verification model seems to specify that they should be handled the
> same way as blocks outside the VOP or video packet (i.e. use zero values
as
> predictors instead of actual inter block ac coefficient values).
>
> BR, Jani
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Jani Huoponen
> Engineering Manager, System Design
> Hantro Products Oy
> Nahkatehtaankatu 2, 90100 Oulu, Finland
> +358-40-5272676
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Technotes mailing list
> Technotes@lists.m4if.org
> http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
>
From HerpelC@thmulti.com Mon Jun 11 10:32:35 2001
Received: from ns2.thmulti.com (dmzraw2.thmulti.com [141.11.234.68])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5BEWYC09959
for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:32:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from parexch3.paris.thmulti.com ([141.11.194.5])
by ns2.thmulti.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA16791
for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:32:26 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by parexch3 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:32:19 +0200
Message-ID: <2CEEE9E85750D2119F4000805F317288DD8316@hanexch1.hanover.thmulti.com>
From: Herpel Carsten
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:01:17 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
The issue is: If this cannot be read unambiguously from the spec, a
Corrigendum should be made to remove this ambiguity.
Is it ambiguous from the written spec?
Regards,
Carsten
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| THOMSON multimedia -------------------------- CR Hannover |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Carsten Herpel |
| Deutsche Thomson-Brandt GmbH |
| Karl-Wiechert-Allee 74 Tel.: +49 511 418 2510 |
| 30625 Hannover Fax.: +49 511 418 2483 |
| Germany mailto:herpelc@thmulti.com |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
-----Original Message-----
From: Ramkishor Korada [mailto:ramki@emuzed.com]
Sent: 11 June, 2001 14:21
To: Jani Huoponen; technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
Hi,
When the block is not Intra (Inter), then they should be handled the same
way as blocks outside VOP or packet i.e., use zero values as predictors.
warm regards,
ramkishor
Architect - Video
Digital Media Technology Division
Emuzed Bangalore Division
IndiraNagar,Bangalore
www.emuzed.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jani Huoponen"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:48 AM
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
> Hi all,
>
> There seems to be one vague point in the Visual standard regarding the AC
> prediction, I would like to have your opinion on the interpretation of the
> standard.
>
> So the question is:
>
> What values are supposed to use in ac prediction if type of the prediction
> block (block 'A' or block 'C') is not intra? Standard does not seem to
> impose any restrictions on usage of inter blocks as ac predictor blocks
but
> video verification model seems to specify that they should be handled the
> same way as blocks outside the VOP or video packet (i.e. use zero values
as
> predictors instead of actual inter block ac coefficient values).
>
> BR, Jani
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Jani Huoponen
> Engineering Manager, System Design
> Hantro Products Oy
> Nahkatehtaankatu 2, 90100 Oulu, Finland
> +358-40-5272676
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Technotes mailing list
> Technotes@lists.m4if.org
> http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
>
_______________________________________________
Technotes mailing list
Technotes@lists.m4if.org
http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
From pertti.lihavainen@hulikakku.suomi.net Wed Jun 20 07:38:46 2001
Received: from verkko.suomi.net (sun250-0-admin.suomi.net [212.50.140.140])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5KBcjW17944
for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lihiscbuilder5 (hulikakku9.suomi.net)
by verkko.suomi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.05.24.18.28.p7)
with SMTP id <0GF8007098413Y@verkko.suomi.net> for technotes@lists.m4if.org;
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:33:50 +0300 (EET DST)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:36:47 +0100
From: Pertti Lihavainen
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Message-id: <002f01c0f98e$18ac2120$090b000a@suomi.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0024_01C0F996.71190690"
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000
X-Priority: 3
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] subscribed
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C0F996.71190690
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subscribed
pertti.lihavainen@hulikakku.suomi.net
------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C0F996.71190690
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subscribed
------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C0F996.71190690--
From bj@sasken.com Fri Jun 22 09:30:24 2001
Received: from samar.sasken.com (samar.sasken.com [164.164.56.2])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5MDUKQ06477
for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from samar (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by samar.sasken.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5MDU0t03702
for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:00:10 +0530 (IST)
Received: from localhost (bj@localhost)
by sunms2.sasken.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA29923
for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:59:57 +0530 (IST)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:59:57 +0530 (IST)
From: B Jagadeesh
To:
In-Reply-To: <035b01c0f270$fd67c870$0d0aa8c0@blr.emuzed.com>
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] GOV header for enhancement layer
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Dear All,
Group of VOP (GOV) header is optional as per the MPEG-4 visual standard.
In the case of temporal scalability, if an encoder decides to have a GOV
header in the base layer, should the GOV header be present in the
corresponding enhancement layer bit stream also?
Can GOV header be present in the enhancement layer bit stream? Is it
allowed as per MPEG-4 Visual standard?
If base layer has GOV header and enhancement layer does not, then
calculation of the Composition Time Stamp (CTS) for an enhancement
layer VOP will depend on CTS of the Base layer VOPs.
I request experts to comment on this.
regards,
B. Jagadeesh, Ph.D.,
Sasken Communication technologies Limited,
Bangalore, Inida.
From Jani.Huoponen@hantro.com Tue Jun 26 01:25:11 2001
Received: from hantrodom5.hantro.com (mx.hantro.com [62.236.81.133])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5Q5PBm02004
for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:25:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by HANTRODOM5 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:22:20 +0300
Message-ID:
From: Jani Huoponen
To: Herpel Carsten , technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:22:20 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx3.magma.ca id f5Q5PBm02004
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi,
Actually, this issue is not ambigous in the Visual standard, it does not say
that you should treat inter blocks any differently from intra blocks.
However, the video verification model document describes it other way, i.e.,
inter blocks should be treated as blocks outside of VOP or video packet (as
Ramkishor says below). This interpretation seems to be quite common and if
this is the way to do it then there should be a Corrigendum for it.
Otherwise the Video Verification Model doc should be corrected to match the
actual Visual standard.
Which way to go?
br, Jani
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herpel Carsten [mailto:HerpelC@thmulti.com]
> Sent: 11. kesäkuuta 2001 17:01
> To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
> Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
>
>
> The issue is: If this cannot be read unambiguously from the spec, a
> Corrigendum should be made to remove this ambiguity.
>
> Is it ambiguous from the written spec?
>
> Regards,
> Carsten
> +-----------------------------------------------------------+
> | THOMSON multimedia -------------------------- CR Hannover |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------+
> | Carsten Herpel |
> | Deutsche Thomson-Brandt GmbH |
> | Karl-Wiechert-Allee 74 Tel.: +49 511 418 2510 |
> | 30625 Hannover Fax.: +49 511 418 2483 |
> | Germany mailto:herpelc@thmulti.com |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramkishor Korada [mailto:ramki@emuzed.com]
> Sent: 11 June, 2001 14:21
> To: Jani Huoponen; technotes@lists.m4if.org
> Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
>
>
> Hi,
> When the block is not Intra (Inter), then they should be
> handled the same
> way as blocks outside VOP or packet i.e., use zero values as
> predictors.
>
> warm regards,
> ramkishor
>
> Architect - Video
> Digital Media Technology Division
> Emuzed Bangalore Division
> IndiraNagar,Bangalore
> www.emuzed.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jani Huoponen"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:48 AM
> Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There seems to be one vague point in the Visual standard
> regarding the AC
> > prediction, I would like to have your opinion on the
> interpretation of the
> > standard.
> >
> > So the question is:
> >
> > What values are supposed to use in ac prediction if type of
> the prediction
> > block (block 'A' or block 'C') is not intra? Standard does
> not seem to
> > impose any restrictions on usage of inter blocks as ac
> predictor blocks
> but
> > video verification model seems to specify that they should
> be handled the
> > same way as blocks outside the VOP or video packet (i.e.
> use zero values
> as
> > predictors instead of actual inter block ac coefficient values).
> >
> > BR, Jani
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jani Huoponen
> > Engineering Manager, System Design
> > Hantro Products Oy
> > Nahkatehtaankatu 2, 90100 Oulu, Finland
> > +358-40-5272676
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Technotes mailing list
> > Technotes@lists.m4if.org
> > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Technotes mailing list
> Technotes@lists.m4if.org
> http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
> _______________________________________________
> Technotes mailing list
> Technotes@lists.m4if.org
> http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes
>
From axel.binder@philips.com Mon Jul 9 04:00:21 2001
Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6980Lr06294;
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:00:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1])
by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id KAA16199;
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:19 +0200 (MEST)
(envelope-from axel.binder@philips.com)
From: axel.binder@philips.com
Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com(130.139.36.22) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a)
id xma016191; Mon, 9 Jul 01 10:00:19 +0200
Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id KAA09318; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10])
by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id KAA12510; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:14 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from EMAUO01.diamond.philips.com (emauo01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.215])
by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id JAA11592; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:59:03 +0200 (MET DST)
To: infolist@lists.m4if.org, technotes@lists.m4if.org
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:59:23 +0200
Message-ID:
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on EMAUO01/H/SERVER/PHILIPS(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at
09/07/2001 10:13:14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4 Question about alpha values
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi,
I found several places where alpha values are calculated
for gray level shapes and during BIFS lighting. However,
I couldn't find any place where these values (from the frame
buffer, composed scene) are used again. Did I miss something
or are the calculations of the destination alpha values
obsolete?
Thanks in advance
Axel
=====================================================
Axel Binder Philips Starnberg
Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17
D-82319 Starnberg
phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany
fax: +49 8151 270 200
mobile: +49 172 92 18 623
e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com
=====================================================
From axel.binder@philips.com Mon Jul 9 04:28:38 2001
Received: from regent.netkonect.net (regent.netkonect.net [194.62.44.60])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f698Scr08955;
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:28:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pathe1.ace-internet.co.uk ([194.164.150.69])
by regent.netkonect.net (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f698Sq813388;
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:28:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pathe1.ace-internet.co.uk (BRITISHPATHE01 [10.0.0.2]) by pathe1.ace-internet.co.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
id LP3ZF79C; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:33:21 +0100
Received: by pathe1.ace-internet.co.uk (Microsoft Exchange Connector for POP3 Mailboxes 4.50.2113) with SMTP (Global POP3 Download)
id MSG07092001-093105-6601.MMD@BRITISHPATHE01; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:31:06 +0100
Received: from megadodo.segNET.COM (megadodo.segNET.COM [206.34.181.3])
by ns.aceinternet.co.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f698Clw05405
for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:12:48 +0100
Received: from mx3.magma.ca (mx3.magma.ca [206.191.0.251])
by megadodo.segNET.COM (8.9.1a/8.8.5a) with ESMTP id EAA09914;
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx3.magma.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6984Hr06682;
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:04:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6980Lr06294;
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:00:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1])
by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id KAA16199;
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:19 +0200 (MEST)
(envelope-from axel.binder@philips.com)
From: axel.binder@philips.com
Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com(130.139.36.22) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a)
id xma016191; Mon, 9 Jul 01 10:00:19 +0200
Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id KAA09318; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10])
by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id KAA12510; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:14 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from EMAUO01.diamond.philips.com (emauo01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.215])
by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id JAA11592; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:59:03 +0200 (MET DST)
To: infolist@lists.m4if.org, technotes@lists.m4if.org
Message-ID:
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on EMAUO01/H/SERVER/PHILIPS(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at
09/07/2001 10:13:14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: infolist@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:59:23 +0200
X-UIDL: 0a'!!B+,!!HYA"!pbT"!
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] [M4IF Infolist] MPEG-4 Question about alpha values
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi,
I found several places where alpha values are calculated
for gray level shapes and during BIFS lighting. However,
I couldn't find any place where these values (from the frame
buffer, composed scene) are used again. Did I miss something
or are the calculations of the destination alpha values
obsolete?
Thanks in advance
Axel
=====================================================
Axel Binder Philips Starnberg
Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17
D-82319 Starnberg
phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany
fax: +49 8151 270 200
mobile: +49 172 92 18 623
e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com
=====================================================
_______________________________________________
M4IF General Information list
Infolist@lists.m4if.org
http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/infolist
From renaud@envivio.com Mon Jul 9 04:34:59 2001
Received: from jupiter.rennes.envivio.com (france.envivio.com [195.101.247.161])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f698Yxr09578
for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:34:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from envivio.com (dynhost107.rennes.envivio.com [192.168.105.107])
by jupiter.rennes.envivio.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id KAA30929;
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:34:51 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: jupiter.rennes.envivio.com: Host dynhost107.rennes.envivio.com [192.168.105.107] claimed to be envivio.com
Message-ID: <3B496D71.72848CE5@envivio.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 10:38:09 +0200
From: Renaud Cazoulat
Organization: Envivio France
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: axel.binder@philips.com
CC: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4 Question about alpha values
References:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi,
You probably should have a look to the VRML documentation
(a good start is http://www.best.com/~rikk/Book/)
Renaud
Envivio
axel.binder@philips.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found several places where alpha values are calculated
> for gray level shapes and during BIFS lighting. However,
> I couldn't find any place where these values (from the frame
> buffer, composed scene) are used again. Did I miss something
> or are the calculations of the destination alpha values
> obsolete?
From axel.binder@philips.com Tue Jul 10 11:24:07 2001
Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6AFO6r01791
for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1])
by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id RAA15600
for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:24:05 +0200 (MEST)
(envelope-from axel.binder@philips.com)
From: axel.binder@philips.com
Received: from smtpscan-nl3.philips.com(130.139.36.23) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a)
id xma015598; Tue, 10 Jul 01 17:24:05 +0200
Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA15836
for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:24:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10])
by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA28900
for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:24:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from EMAUO01.diamond.philips.com (emauo01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.215])
by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA16724
for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:23:33 +0200 (MET DST)
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:23:58 +0200
Message-ID:
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on EMAUO01/H/SERVER/PHILIPS(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at
10/07/2001 17:37:46
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
Hi,
can anybody tell me for which visual profiles the
"overlapped motion compensation"-tool (OBMC) is employed?
Due to the profile overview in the standard it's never
used. In some requirement document I found it was proposed for
Main profile.
thanks beforehand
axel
=====================================================
Axel Binder Philips Starnberg
Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17
D-82319 Starnberg
phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany
fax: +49 8151 270 200
mobile: +49 172 92 18 623
e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com
=====================================================
From fp@lx.it.pt Tue Jul 10 12:03:20 2001
Received: from cascais.lx.it.pt (cascais.lx.it.pt [193.136.221.1])
by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6AG3Gr05724
for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:03:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from amalia.img.lx.it.pt (amalia.img.lx.it.pt [193.136.222.20])
by cascais.lx.it.pt (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6AGs1d17549;
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:54:02 GMT
Received: from lx.it.pt (neptuno [193.136.222.28])
by amalia.img.lx.it.pt (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA10078;
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:02:28 GMT
Message-ID: <3B4B2785.87B58316@lx.it.pt>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:04:21 +0100
From: Fernando Pereira
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: axel.binder@philips.com, technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile
References:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org
X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe: ,
List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4