From bill.mandel@unistudios.com Fri Apr 20 14:50:58 2001 Received: from usushntex51.unistudios.com (outmail.unistudios.com [192.251.67.111]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f3KIovn12156 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usintex10lax.udh.unistudios.com (USINTEX10LAX [167.167.130.69]) by usushntex51.unistudios.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id J21VY02R; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:50:37 -0700 Received: by USINTEX10LAX with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:50:57 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Mandel, Bill" To: "'technotes@lists.m4if.org'" Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:50:47 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: [M4IF Technotes] FW: [M4IF Infolist] MPEG-4 and MHP and SMIL? Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: (moved over) This has been an interesting thread. Are we seeing a divergence of specs with similar user experience goals? I'd like to hear some comments comparing how user experiences/apps are developed in addition to how the various formats overlap. Technology Implementation/Authoring Timeframe MHP Java or (Bean Tool?) Today? MPEG4 Scripting (BIFS Tool?) <1 year SMIL2.0 Handcoding or Tool Ongoing Flash Authoring Tool Ongoing DHTML/ActiveX Handcoding? Ongoing Are there comparison(s) to be made between BIFS and SMIL? Regards, Bill Mandel From ayerkes@gmvnetwork.com Fri Apr 27 22:15:23 2001 Received: from mail.genxnet.com (mail.genxnet.com [216.214.194.215]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f3S2FN612069 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 22:15:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gmvnetwork.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.genxnet.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f3S2FIN07956 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 21:15:18 -0500 Message-Id: <200104280215.f3S2FIN07956@mail.genxnet.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 02:15:18 -0000 To: From: "Art Yerkes" X-Mailer: TWIG 2.6.2 X-Client-IP: 216.214.221.177 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 0.7 (http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang/) Subject: [M4IF Technotes] DMIF and uuData Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello all, We have implemented a DMIF instance (apart from any comittee sources) that we believe is commercially viable. It's a C API that uses an XML configuration. The DMIF specification makes it possible to write such an API enabling applications to stream MPEG-4 without knowing about transports or protocols. It has gone well. We have written some sample code with it, and it fully complies with DMIF. The development of DMIF represents significant change in the design of media infrstructure when it becomes mainstream, because it allows a beautiful sharing of code between applications. I am confident that, IP issues aside, DMIF will become the preeminent API for writing streaming apps, because it provides an amicable divorce between code that implements transport and code that implements the 'value', presentation, player, IPMP, and other code. However, I noticed one thing that makes DMIF more complicated to adhere to if you don't know what application your DMIF instance will be communicating with. In our case, our DMIF is meant to be sold as a component. Perhaps no-one else plans to do this, but we wanted to mention our problem in hopes that someone else may benefit from sharing experience about this matter. I propose a problem and one possible solution. I am interested in hearing comments both about our view of this problem and our intended solution. The problem as I see it is that uuData in it's many forms throughout the specification of the DMIF Application interface is only opaque data. Even though this data is meant for interpretation by the application and not by DMIF, conforming applications eventually need to settle on a form for this data both to prevent misinterpretation by incompatible DMIF applications which implement the same protocol, and to facilitate good communication between DMIF applications that are meant to be compatible. I have several reasons for thinking this: 1) A vendor may wish to implement a DMIF service layer (part of a "peer application," running on the same computer that reads a certain filetype and delivers data to the DAI layer of the calling application. The generaic service provider needs a way to interface with potentially many Originating DMIF peer applications. 2) In 14496-6.10.4.1, it is specified that the DMIF user 'might' provide additional information such as client credentials in uuData. A media-unaware transport agent (such as a firewall tunnel or similar) may need to check credentials before admission to the firewalled environment. This necessitates an application independent method at least for credentials signalling. In HTTP and RTSP, this is handled with a WWW-Authenticate response-header, which allows any HTTP-enabled application to interact in a seamless manner with different authentication systems of which it is aware. This does not limit application freedom very much. Vendors still have the opportunity to use any available authentication mechanism (nothing is specified about what mechanism to use), it simply allows the mechanism and it's associated data to be clearly identified. 3) In 14496-6.10.4.5, the uuDataIn field provides information about the channels requested. This information is important when individual elementary streams contain different parts of a presentation. An example of this would be a presentation containing several JFIF images connected by hyperlinks, such as the menu system for a kiosk. Although this information is "opaque to the delivery layer", it is not opaque to the remote DMIF application. Again, an identification of what data has been sent should also be sent in a standard form, probably a MIME type preceeding the data. Again, This is not too much to ask, and provides the benefit of letting the peer DMIF application know what to expect. Even better would be the specification of a requested ES_ID form and position. This would allow (for example) a disk DMIF instance to correctly identify a requested elementary stream in a uniform way. It would also allow two DMIF peers made by different companies to dicuss a specific elementary stream, even if they were not 'born' compatible. 4) In 14496-6.10.4.6, the specification states that the ES_ID may be present in the return uuData. It's presence and form (2 bytes, network byte order?) should be specified, as well as where it can be found in the uuData should be specified. This makes it possible for an application to silently ignore most of the opaque data that it doesn't understand, but still retrieve the ES_ID. 5) In 14496-6.10.4.9, as with the other uuData fields, this one carries no indication of it's contents. The problem here is that both a local DMIF scenario, and a remote instance have need of the information contained therein. This field has been implemented as four-byte little endian integers and as text strings. It would be nice to get an indication of the control scheme in use. An 'integer' scheme would not be pleased to get the string 'PLAY\0' and likewise, a DMIF peer implemented to expect null terminated strings would be imperiled by the reception of '\010TEARDOWN' (a string with the length information in front). While one might envision several solutions, I would propose that uuData objects follow HTTP style rules: At least a 'Content-Type: ...' header must be present before any data, but any number of response headers are allowed. Response headers are terminated by a blank line. Any data, binary, ASCII, opaque or otherwise may follow. The Content-Length header is never needed in this scenario because the length of the object is specified in the DMIF primitive itself. The payload part of the Content-Type header should be a textural MIME type. I also propose that the HTTP style WWW-Authenticate scheme be used in the ServiceAttach and ServiceDetach (when attachment is denied). I further propose that ES_ID, when present, shall be sent among the headers as mpeg4-esid, or mpeg4-esids if there are multiples (as sugguested in the draft-singer-mpeg4-ip-02 IETF draft. I wanted to gather comments and see if anyone else is like minded. Perhaps, this type of discussion can be the basis for either a formal or informal rule with regard to those pesky opaque bytes. References Title: A Framework for the delivery of MPEG-4 over IP-based Protocols Authors: D. Singer, Y Lim URL: http://www.ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/internet-drafts/draft-singer-mpeg4-ip-02.txt Title: Real Time Streaming Protocol Authors: H. Schulzrinne URL: http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/Orig/rfc2326.txt Title: Hypertext Transfer Protocol Authors: R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J Mogul, H. Frystyk, L. Masinter, P. Leach, T. Berners-Lee URL: http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/Orig/rfc2616.txt Art Yerkes Chief Software Architect GMV Network -- HTTP_TRACE( "RTSPSession has died of snarfage.\n" ) -- Anonymous C source file #define SS_USR 6 /* The user is broken */ -- Anonymous Header File From LMing@tvia.com Tue May 1 20:47:55 2001 Received: from sanjose.tvia.com (66-2-124-157.customer.algx.net [66.2.124.157]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f420lsX25249 for ; Tue, 1 May 2001 20:47:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sanjose.tvia.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 17:44:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Lei Ming To: "'technotes@lists.m4if.org'" Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 17:44:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: [M4IF Technotes] help Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, All, I have a question about the scalability in MPEG4. If "ref_select_code" is 1. What are the reference Vops (backward + forward) for enhancement Vops in the following example? I B P B P B base | | | | | | ------------------------------------- enh | | | | | P B B B B Regards, Lei ---------------------------------- Lei Ming Tvia Inc. (408)982-8588 ext. 162 From axel.binder@philips.com Mon May 7 22:52:02 2001 Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f482q1t11474 for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 22:52:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id EAA12313 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:52:00 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from axel.binder@philips.com) From: axel.binder@philips.com Received: from smtprelay-eur1.philips.com(130.139.36.3) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma012311; Tue, 8 May 01 04:52:00 +0200 Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10]) by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id EAA02743 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:52:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from EMLMS01.DIAMOND.PHILIPS.COM (emlms01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.213]) by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id EAA24346 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:51:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by EMLMS01.DIAMOND.PHILIPS.COM (Soft-Switch LMS 4.0) with snapi via EMEA1 id 0056900017783826; Tue, 8 May 2001 05:04:44 +0200 To: Message-ID: <0056900017783826000002L062*@MHS> Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 05:04:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name="MEMO 05/08/01 04:51:48" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx3.magma.ca id f482q1t11474 Subject: [M4IF Technotes] gray shapes Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi together, there is a filter defined for subsampling binary shapes when they are applied to chrominance planes. Is there a similar filter defined for gray shapes? Take the average, take the maximum alpha, ...? regards axel binder ===================================================== Axel Binder Philips Starnberg Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17 D-82319 Starnberg phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany fax: +49 8151 270 200 mobile: +49 172 92 18 623 e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com ===================================================== From ramki@emuzed.com Tue May 15 10:38:53 2001 Received: from emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com (emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com [161.58.152.119]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f4FEcrM16163 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 10:38:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ramki ([202.9.170.21]) by emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com (8.11.2) id f4FEcgt96931; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:38:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <01e001c0dd4c$bd68d130$0d0aa8c0@blr.emuzed.com> From: "Ramkishor Korada" To: Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 20:08:33 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C0DD7A.D12FE720" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Subject: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4/H.263 Test Sequences! Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C0DD7A.D12FE720 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I am looking for MPEG-4/H.263 test sequences of CIF/SIF size at a frame = rate of 25/30.=20 Can some one suggest the URLs from where these sequences can be = downloaded? Thanks in advance, regards, ramkishor Architect - Video Multimedia Technologies Division Emuzed Bangalore Division IndiraNagar,Bangalore www.emuzed.com ------=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C0DD7A.D12FE720 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
 I am looking for MPEG-4/H.263 = test sequences=20 of CIF/SIF size at a frame rate of 25/30.
 
Can some one suggest the URLs from = where these=20 sequences can be downloaded?
 
Thanks in advance,
regards,
ramkishor
 
Architect - Video
Multimedia = Technologies=20 Division
Emuzed Bangalore Division
IndiraNagar,Bangalore
www.emuzed.com
= ------=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C0DD7A.D12FE720-- From garysull@microsoft.com Tue May 15 11:50:54 2001 Received: from mail2.microsoft.com (mail2.microsoft.com [131.107.3.124]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f4FFosM22108 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 11:50:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 157.54.9.104 by mail2.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 15 May 2001 08:47:18 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Received: from red-msg-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.70]) by inet-imc-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2883); Tue, 15 May 2001 08:47:13 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4688.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0DD56.4F37D84B" Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4/H.263 Test Sequences! Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 08:47:13 -0700 Message-ID: <0170DDAD0BADFA4CBEC3B55A0748DCCC02C2409D@red-msg-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4/H.263 Test Sequences! Thread-Index: AcDdTQLT9470rg4IRaGsxwQZrENDiAAB65bQ From: "Gary Sullivan" To: "Ramkishor Korada" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2001 15:47:13.0700 (UTC) FILETIME=[4F7EA640:01C0DD56] Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0DD56.4F37D84B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You can get some of them from http://standard.pictel.com/ftp/video-site/sequences and some from http://kbs.cs.tu-berlin.de/~stewe/vceg/sequences.htm =20 Best Regards, =20 -Gary Sullivan -----Original Message----- From: Ramkishor Korada [mailto:ramki@emuzed.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:39 AM To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4/H.263 Test Sequences! Hi, I am looking for MPEG-4/H.263 test sequences of CIF/SIF size at a frame rate of 25/30.=20 =20 Can some one suggest the URLs from where these sequences can be downloaded? =20 Thanks in advance, regards, ramkishor =20 Architect - Video Multimedia Technologies Division Emuzed Bangalore Division IndiraNagar,Bangalore www.emuzed.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0DD56.4F37D84B Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You=20 can get some of them from http://stand= ard.pictel.com/ftp/video-site/sequences
and=20 some from http://kbs.= cs.tu-berlin.de/~stewe/vceg/sequences.htm
 
Best=20 Regards,
 
-Gary=20 Sullivan
-----Original Message-----
From: Ramkishor Korada=20 [mailto:ramki@emuzed.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:39=20 AM
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: [M4IF = Technotes]=20 MPEG-4/H.263 Test Sequences!

Hi,
 I am looking for MPEG-4/H.263 = test=20 sequences of CIF/SIF size at a frame rate of 25/30.
 
Can some one suggest the URLs from = where these=20 sequences can be downloaded?
 
Thanks in advance,
regards,
ramkishor
 
Architect - Video
Multimedia = Technologies=20 Division
Emuzed Bangalore Division
IndiraNagar,Bangalore
www.emuzed.com
<= /FONT> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0DD56.4F37D84B-- From mikael.reichel@culinaire.se Wed May 23 12:14:18 2001 Received: from algonet.se (garibaldi.tninet.se [195.100.94.103]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f4NGEHF00098 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:14:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 266p2 (sdu165-242.ppp.algonet.se [195.163.242.165]) by garibaldi.tninet.se (BLUETAIL Mail Robustifier 2.2.2) with ESMTP id 136230.634455.990garibaldi-s0 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 18:14:15 +0200 Message-ID: <044901c0e3a3$fa149080$ef4ca3c3@266p2> From: "Mikael Reichel" To: "MPEG4 Org list" Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 18:07:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_042F_01C0E3B3.4D0CA7A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Watkinson MPEG4 seminar in June, Switzerland Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_042F_01C0E3B3.4D0CA7A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All!=20 F.Y.I John Watkinson is holding his two-day MPEG4 technical seminar on = June 18-19 in Vevey, Switzerland.=20 This event is just prior to the MITIL conference/show running on to the = 20-23 of June. Special package offer available. =20 For full details, downloads etc on the MPEG for seminar please visit = www.culinaire.se=20 =20 Alternatively mail me and I will send you the required information and = registration forms. Should you not be able to attend the event but interested to do so when = and if offered closer to you, let me know as the level of interest has = direct bearing on us setting this up. John=B4s book on MPEG4 is being printed now and released in September. = Publisher is, as usual, Focal Press. Kind regards Mikael.Reichel@culinaire.se=20 John Watkinson & Associates _________________________________________________________________ "I do not distinguish by the eye but by the mind which is the proper = judge of man",=20 Seneca. 8 B.C.- 65 A.D. "I know but one freedom & that is the freedom of the mind" -- Antoine de = Saint-Exupery "The future of television is the Internet" Mike 1993 A.D. "Knowledge is not knowledge until someone else knows you know" Lucilius = 124 B.C "A cynic is what people who can=B4t see whats coming is calling those = that can" Watkinson 01 Phone/fax/voicemail +46-(0)8-541 31500 Mobile +46(0)708-541792 Address; Ytterbystrand 6, S-185 94 Vaxholm, SWEDEN _________________________________________________________________ ------=_NextPart_000_042F_01C0E3B3.4D0CA7A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All! 
F.Y.I John Watkinson is holding his two-day MPEG4 = technical=20 seminar on June 18-19 in Vevey, Switzerland.
This event is just = prior to the=20 MITIL conference/show running on to = the 20-23=20 of June. Special package offer available.
 
For full details, = downloads etc on the MPEG for seminar please visit www.culinaire.se =
 
Alternatively=20 mail me and I will send you the required information and registration=20 forms.
 
Should you not be able to attend the event = but interested to do=20 so when and if offered closer to you, let me know as the level of = interest=20 has direct bearing on us setting this up.
 
John=B4s book on MPEG4 is being printed now and released in = September.=20 Publisher is, as usual, Focal Press.

Kind regards
Mikael.Reichel@culinaire.se 
John=20 Watkinson &=20 Associates
_____________________________________________= ____________________
"I=20 do not distinguish by the eye but by the mind which is the proper judge = of man",=20
Seneca. 8 B.C.- 65 A.D.
"I know but one freedom & that is the = freedom=20 of the mind" -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
"The future of television is = the=20 Internet" Mike 1993 A.D.
"Knowledge is not knowledge until someone = else knows=20 you know" Lucilius 124 B.C
"A cynic is what people who can=B4t see = whats coming=20 is calling those that can" Watkinson 01
Phone/fax/voicemail = +46-(0)8-541=20 31500 Mobile +46(0)708-541792
Address; Ytterbystrand 6, S-185 94 = Vaxholm,=20 SWEDEN
_______________________________________________________________= __
 
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_042F_01C0E3B3.4D0CA7A0-- From lcheng61@hotmail.com Wed May 30 18:54:08 2001 Received: from hotmail.com (f75.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.75]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f4UMs7J26649 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 18:54:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 30 May 2001 15:54:01 -0700 Received: from 128.200.38.161 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 30 May 2001 22:54:01 GMT X-Originating-IP: [128.200.38.161] From: "Liang Cheng" To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 06:54:01 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2001 22:54:01.0911 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B5FCC70:01C0E95B] Subject: [M4IF Technotes] help about 14496-1 version 2 Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive:

Dear all,

Now we met a trouble when we studied the interactivities between MPEG-4 node and human.  We are unfortunately using 14496-1:1999(E) Date 1998-12-18, and the serial number of this document is N2501.  Obviously, it is MPEG-4 system on version 1. 

We just heard the version 2 has already come up and it includes more advanced user interaction function.  We look forward to obtaining it.  Can someone of you tell me where we can buy the MPEG-4 standard serials in version 2?  We will be appreciate it if you may help us.

Liang



 

 


Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

From rkoenen@intertrust.com Fri Jun 1 02:43:50 2001 Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.163.3]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f516hnM03033 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 02:43:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id XAA16272 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 23:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown(198.3.162.27) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (V5.5) id xma016139; Thu, 31 May 01 23:43:25 -0700 Received: from exchange.epr.com (exchange.epr.com [198.3.162.249]) by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA18257; Thu, 31 May 2001 23:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by exchange.epr.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 23:41:56 -0700 Message-ID: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B032BC97F@exchange.epr.com> From: Rob Koenen To: Liang Cheng , technotes@lists.m4if.org Cc: "Olivier Avaro (E-mail 2)" Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] help about 14496-1 version 2 Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 23:41:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0EA65.F261B520" Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0EA65.F261B520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?ICS1=35&ICS2=40 &ICS3=0&CSNUMBER=24462 links to 14496-1:1999 - the 1999 version of MPEG-4 Systems Olivier, does that include Version 2? If not, when will the 2000 edition be available from ISO? Thanks, Rob -----Original Message----- From: Liang Cheng [mailto:lcheng61@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 30 May, 2001 15:54 To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: [M4IF Technotes] help about 14496-1 version 2 Dear all, Now we met a trouble when we studied the interactivities between MPEG-4 node and human. We are unfortunately using 14496-1:1999(E) Date 1998-12-18, and the serial number of this document is N2501. Obviously, it is MPEG-4 system on version 1. We just heard the version 2 has already come up and it includes more advanced user interaction function. We look forward to obtaining it. Can someone of you tell me where we can buy the MPEG-4 standard serials in version 2? We will be appreciate it if you may help us. Liang _____ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com . _______________________________________________ Technotes mailing list Technotes@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0EA65.F261B520 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?IC= S1=3D35&ICS2=3D40&ICS3=3D0&CSNUMBER=3D24462
links=20 to 14496-1:1999 - the 1999 version of MPEG-4 = Systems
 
Olivier, does that include Version 2?
If=20 not, when will the 2000 edition be available from = ISO?
 
Thanks,
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Liang Cheng=20 [mailto:lcheng61@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 May, 2001 = 15:54
To: technotes@lists.m4if.org
Subject: [M4IF = Technotes] help about 14496-1 version 2

Dear all,

Now we met a trouble when we studied the interactivities between = MPEG-4=20 node and human.  We are unfortunately using 14496-1:1999(E) Date = 1998-12-18, and the serial number of this document is N2501.  = Obviously,=20 it is MPEG-4 system on version 1. 

We just heard the version 2 has already come up and it includes = more=20 advanced user interaction function.  We look forward to = obtaining=20 it.  Can someone of you tell me where we can buy the MPEG-4 = standard=20 serials in version 2?  We will be appreciate it if you may help = us.

Liang



 

 


Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

_______________________________________________ Technotes = mailing list=20 Technotes@lists.m4if.org=20 http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0EA65.F261B520-- From olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com Sat Jun 2 20:03:44 2001 Received: from prserv.net (out1.prserv.net [32.97.166.31]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5303hC19807 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 20:03:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rptw2kavaro (slip32-106-67-11.mlv.fr.prserv.net[32.106.67.11]) by prserv.net (out1) with SMTP id <2001060300034020100hsg7ce>; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 00:03:41 +0000 Reply-To: From: "AVARO Olivier FTRD/DIH" To: "'Rob Koenen'" , "'Liang Cheng'" , Cc: "'Olivier Avaro \(E-mail 2\)'" Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] help about 14496-1 version 2 Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 01:31:59 +0200 Message-ID: <000a01c0ebc0$e197bd00$0b436a20@rptw2kavaro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C0EBD1.A5208D00" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B032BC97F@exchange.epr.com> Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: C'est un message de format MIME en plusieurs parties. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C0EBD1.A5208D00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, Olivier, does that include Version 2? Yes. If not, when will the 2000 edition be available from ISO? First, it's not 2000 but 2001. The ISO secretariat is waiting for the proof of 14496-1:2001 from ITTF. So it should be here soon. cu, O. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C0EBD1.A5208D00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
Olivier, does that include Version 2? 
Yes.
 
If not, when will the 2000 edition be available from = ISO? 
First, it's not 2000 but=20 2001.
The ISO secretariat is=20 waiting for the proof of = 14496-1:2001 from=20 ITTF.
So it should = be here=20 soon.
cu,
O.
=
 
<= /BODY> ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C0EBD1.A5208D00-- From Jeyur.Patel@Mysoremail.ltitl.com Mon Jun 4 03:02:55 2001 Received: from ltitlrelay.ltitl.com ([203.199.54.28]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5472pC09373 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 03:02:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Mysoremail.ltitl.com ([172.25.26.2]) by ltitlrelay.ltitl.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.5) with SMTP id 2001060412314872:15289 ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:31:48 +0530 Received: by Mysoremail.ltitl.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 65256A61.00267813 ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:30:11 +0530 X-Lotus-FromDomain: MYSORE From: Jeyur.Patel@Mysoremail.ltitl.com To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Message-ID: <65256A61.0026776F.00@Mysoremail.ltitl.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:30:08 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on ltitlrelay/Ltitl(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 06/04/2001 12:31:51 PM, Serialize by Router on ltitlrelay/Ltitl(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 06/04/2001 12:32:03 PM, Serialize complete at 06/04/2001 12:32:03 PM Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Doubt Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Dear all, We have a basic doubt about MPEG-4 visual encoder and decoder Verification Model Software. We have got two Reference software for MPEG-4 visual natural CODECs, supplied with MPEG-4 standard ISO/IEC 14496-5, one is implementation of MPEG-4 visual natural encoder & decoder in 'ANSI C' and other is implementation of same in C++. We would like to know the Visual Profile and Level implementated in these Reference Software. Does it support Visual Simple Profile @ Level 3 ? Regards, Jeyur From rudinei@icmc.sc.usp.br Mon Jun 4 13:22:27 2001 Received: from taba2.icmc.sc.usp.br (taba2.icmc.sc.usp.br [143.107.231.16]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f54HMQC08065 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:22:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from icmc.sc.usp.br (terereh.intermidia.icmc.sc.usp.br [143.107.231.201]) by taba2.icmc.sc.usp.br (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f54HMi006844 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 14:22:44 -0300 (EST) Message-ID: <3B1BC435.C814985@icmc.sc.usp.br> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 14:24:05 -0300 From: Rudinei Goularte X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi all! I've tried to compile the IM1Player (core) released by ISO as the MPEG-4 reference software at: http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2489/Ittf_Home/PubliclyAvailableStandards.htm/ (look for 14496-5). I'm using Microsoft Visual C ++ v. 5.0 under Windows 98. The problem is that the compiler returns errors (see below). Fixing (I think) some parts of the code I found that some methods are not implemented. Is it true? I have to "fill in the blanks"? Or have ISO relesead a wrong version? Can someone help-me? Thanks in advance. Rudinei. " DMIFClientFilter.cpp ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or there is no acceptable conversion) FlexDmux.cpp ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or there is no acceptable conversion) MyChannel.cpp ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or there is no acceptable conversion) Error executing cl.exe. " From jean-claude.dufourd@enst.fr Tue Jun 5 04:04:05 2001 Received: from enst.enst.fr (enst.enst.fr [137.194.2.16]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f55845C00809 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 04:04:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from LISZT.enst.fr (liszt-fast.enst.fr [137.194.32.4]) by enst.enst.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id B177F1C8D1; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:04:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from enst.fr (arctic.enst.fr) by LISZT.enst.fr (MX V4.2 AXP) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 10:03:59 MET_DST Message-ID: <3B1C9326.A5F918A3@enst.fr> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 10:07:02 +0200 From: Jean-Claude Dufourd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rudinei Goularte Cc: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software References: <3B1BC435.C814985@icmc.sc.usp.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Rudinei Goularte wrote: > I'm using Microsoft Visual C ++ v. 5.0 under Windows 98. I have used only VC++ 6 for a long time. I believe you have to use v6 to compile the Systems reference software. Best regards JC -- Jean-Claude Dufourd @======================================@ ENST, Dept COMELEC The wing, over the big rock... 46, rue Barrault @======================================@ 75013 Paris Tel: +33145817807 Fax: +33145804036 From yossi@neomagic.co.il Tue Jun 5 09:01:08 2001 Received: from mail.neomagic.co.il (www.asp.co.il [194.90.249.195] (may be forged)) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f55D17C27653 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:01:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from neop12 ([194.90.249.100]) by mail.neomagic.co.il (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA28227 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:39:52 +0300 From: "Yossi" To: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:02:11 +0200 Message-ID: <001601c0edc8$1e571700$64f95ac2@asp.co.il> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Method 1 Quantisation Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Sirs, MPEG4 Video Verification Model (VM 16.0) presents two quantisation methods: H263 and MPEG4 (pp. 61-63). Section 3.4.4.2 describes Method 1 (H263), where Intra DC quantisation is level = dc_coeff // 8 Section 3.4.5.1.1 describes Method 2 (MPEG4), where Intra DC quantisation is level = dc_coeff//dc_scaler, where dc_scaler is a non-linear scaler based on Qp. However, Section 3.4.5.1.1 states, "Note: This section is valid for H.263 quantisation also." Is the Intra DC quantisation method presented in Sec. 3.4.4.2 incorrect? In particular, I am looking at the Simple Profile that allows only Method 1 for quantization (see Table 9-1 in Part 2 of the MPEG4 Standard, page 201). Should Intra DC quantisation for Simple Profile follow Section 3.4.4.2 or Section 3.4.5.1.1? Thank you, Yossi Shain NeoMagic Israel From peterh@videospheres.com Tue Jun 5 09:26:49 2001 Received: from mx1.magmacom.com (mx1.magmacom.com [206.191.0.217]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f55DQnC00022 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:26:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail3.magma.ca (mail3.magma.ca [206.191.0.221]) by mx1.magmacom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA21902; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:26:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from OREOV2 (gate.intouchsurvey.com [206.191.25.226]) by mail3.magma.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA19500; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:26:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Peter Haighton" To: "Yossi" , Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] Method 1 Quantisation Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:27:44 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-Reply-To: <001601c0edc8$1e571700$64f95ac2@asp.co.il> Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi Yossi, The standard states that level = dc_coeff//dc_scaler but it also says that for H.263 (short header=1) dc_scaler is always 8 so that means that both sections are correct. Hope this helps Peter -----Original Message----- From: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org [mailto:technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org]On Behalf Of Yossi Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:02 AM To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Method 1 Quantisation Sirs, MPEG4 Video Verification Model (VM 16.0) presents two quantisation methods: H263 and MPEG4 (pp. 61-63). Section 3.4.4.2 describes Method 1 (H263), where Intra DC quantisation is level = dc_coeff // 8 Section 3.4.5.1.1 describes Method 2 (MPEG4), where Intra DC quantisation is level = dc_coeff//dc_scaler, where dc_scaler is a non-linear scaler based on Qp. However, Section 3.4.5.1.1 states, "Note: This section is valid for H.263 quantisation also." Is the Intra DC quantisation method presented in Sec. 3.4.4.2 incorrect? In particular, I am looking at the Simple Profile that allows only Method 1 for quantization (see Table 9-1 in Part 2 of the MPEG4 Standard, page 201). Should Intra DC quantisation for Simple Profile follow Section 3.4.4.2 or Section 3.4.5.1.1? Thank you, Yossi Shain NeoMagic Israel _______________________________________________ Technotes mailing list Technotes@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes From peterh@videospheres.com Tue Jun 5 11:32:52 2001 Received: from mx2.magma.ca (mx2.magma.ca [206.191.0.250]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f55FWqC12450 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail3.magma.ca (mail3.magma.ca [206.191.0.221]) by mx2.magma.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA10646 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:32:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from OREOV2 (gate.intouchsurvey.com [206.191.25.226]) by mail3.magma.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01418 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:32:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Peter Haighton" To: Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:33:47 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello Rudinei, Olivier Avaro forwarded your question to the implementation group inside MPEG and here is the response that was received. Hope this helps. Thanks Olivier for your help. Peter -----Original Message----- From: owner-im1-sys@advent.ee.columbia.edu [mailto:owner-im1-sys@advent.ee.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Wo Chang Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:25 AM To: Franceschini Guido; olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com; Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail) Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software Dear Rudinei, Guido is correct, you have to use VC6 in order to compile. It is specially true for DMIFClientFilter since its .dsp was generated by the earlier version of VCC (VC5). Before compiling IM1Player via VC6, you need to disable the DMIFClientFilter.dsp from READ-ONLY, so that VC6 can generate DMIFClientFilter.dsp for VC6. You also need to disable the READ-ONLY for the libs in IM1Core\Lib since a new set of libs will be written into this dir. I think this will get you going with the compilation. Have fun. --Wo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Franceschini Guido" To: ; "Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail)" Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:20 AM Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software > The code released always compiled (with VC6), but I remember someone having > troubles using VC5. > I suggest using VC6. > > Guido > > -----Original Message----- > From: AVARO Olivier FTRD/DIH [mailto:olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:26 AM > To: Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail) > Subject: TR: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software > > > > Can someone help ? > cu, > O. > -----Message d'origine----- > De : technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org > [mailto:technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org]De la part de Rudinei Goularte > Envoye : lundi 4 juin 2001 19:24 > A : technotes@lists.m4if.org > Objet : [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software > > > Hi all! > > I've tried to compile the IM1Player (core) released by ISO as the > MPEG-4 reference software at: > http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2489/Ittf_Home/PubliclyAvai > lableStandards.htm/ > > (look for 14496-5). > > I'm using Microsoft Visual C ++ v. 5.0 under Windows 98. > > The problem is that the compiler returns errors (see below). Fixing (I > think) some parts of the code I found that some methods are not > implemented. Is it true? I have to "fill in the blanks"? Or have ISO > relesead a wrong version? > Can someone help-me? > > Thanks in advance. > > Rudinei. > > " > DMIFClientFilter.cpp > ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator > defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or > there is no acceptable conversion) > FlexDmux.cpp > ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator > defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or > there is no acceptable conversion) > MyChannel.cpp > ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator > defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or > there is no acceptable conversion) > Error executing cl.exe. > " > > > _______________________________________________ > Technotes mailing list > Technotes@lists.m4if.org > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes From pertti.lihavainen@hulikakku.suomi.net Wed Jun 6 14:59:03 2001 Received: from verkko.suomi.net (sun250-0-admin.suomi.net [212.50.140.140]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f56Ix2C19551 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:59:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pertilihavainen (hulikakku9.suomi.net) by verkko.suomi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.05.24.18.28.p7) with SMTP id <0GEI00LI5VDO4X@verkko.suomi.net> for technotes@lists.m4if.org; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:58:37 +0300 (EET DST) Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 22:01:28 +0100 From: Pertti Lihavainen To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Message-id: <007801c0eecb$dbd7d220$090b000a@suomi.net> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 X-Priority: 3 Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Subscribing to Technotes Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Subscribing Pertti Lihavainen Koulukatu 32 D 56 90100 Oulu Finland pertti.lihavainen@hulikakku.suomi.net From rkoenen@intertrust.com Thu Jun 7 19:28:53 2001 Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.163.3]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f57NSqC02714 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:28:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id QAA04669 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown(198.3.162.27) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (V5.5) id xma004580; Thu, 7 Jun 01 16:28:46 -0700 Received: from exchange.epr.com (exchange.epr.com [198.3.162.249]) by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12683; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by exchange.epr.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:27:08 -0700 Message-ID: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B032BD0F3@exchange.epr.com> From: Rob Koenen To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Cc: Jeyur.Patel@Mysoremail.ltitl.com, "Michael Wollborn (E-mail)" Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:27:03 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: [M4IF Technotes] re: doubt Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: -----Original Message----- From: Wollborn Michael (FV/SLM) * [mailto:Michael.Wollborn@de.bosch.com] Sent: Thursday, 07 June, 2001 5:41 To: Cc: 'Rob Koenen' Subject: Dear Jeyur, > We would like to know the Visual Profile and Level > implementated in these > Reference Software. > > Does it support Visual Simple Profile @ Level 3 ? the version 1 Reference Software should support all profiles defined in the version 1 of the Standard. Hence, regarding your question, it should also support the Visual Simple Profile. With respect to levels things get more complex, since the reference software was not designed to test conformance. And since it is a software solution, some parameters defined in the level may not apply. Therefore, I think the correct answer with this respect is that you can not really say it supports a certain level, since that also depends on the hardware used etc. Hope this helps. If you have any further related question don't hesitate to ask. Best Regards, Michael _______________________________________________________________________ Dipl.-Ing. Dipl.-Wirt.-Ing. Michael Wollborn Robert Bosch GmbH Phone: +49 5121 49 5017 FV/SLM, PO Box 777777 Fax: +49 5121 49 17 5017 31132 Hildesheim Email: Michael.Wollborn@de.bosch.com Germany http://www.tnt.uni-hannover.de/~wollborn _______________________________________________________________________ "It follows that the Scientist, like the Pilgrim, must wend a straight and narrow path between the Pitfalls of Oversimplification and the Morass of Overcomplication" - Richard Bellman _______________________________________________________________________ From rkoenen@intertrust.com Fri Jun 8 02:47:32 2001 Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.163.3]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f586lWC11764 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 02:47:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id XAA00267 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown(198.3.162.27) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (V5.5) id xma000161; Thu, 7 Jun 01 23:47:08 -0700 Received: from exchange.epr.com (exchange.epr.com [198.3.162.249]) by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA02781 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by exchange.epr.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:45:31 -0700 Message-ID: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B032BD176@exchange.epr.com> From: Rob Koenen To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: FW: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:45:21 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: -----Original Message----- From: owner-im1-sys@advent.ee.columbia.edu [mailto:owner-im1-sys@advent.ee.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Wo Chang Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2001 8:25 To: Franceschini Guido; olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com; Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail) Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software Dear Rudinei, Guido is correct, you have to use VC6 in order to compile. It is specially true for DMIFClientFilter since its .dsp was generated by the earlier version of VCC (VC5). Before compiling IM1Player via VC6, you need to disable the DMIFClientFilter.dsp from READ-ONLY, so that VC6 can generate DMIFClientFilter.dsp for VC6. You also need to disable the READ-ONLY for the libs in IM1Core\Lib since a new set of libs will be written into this dir. I think this will get you going with the compilation. Have fun. --Wo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Franceschini Guido" To: ; "Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail)" Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:20 AM Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software > The code released always compiled (with VC6), but I remember someone having > troubles using VC5. > I suggest using VC6. > > Guido > > -----Original Message----- > From: AVARO Olivier FTRD/DIH [mailto:olivier.avaro@francetelecom.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:26 AM > To: Ref. Sys Im1 (E-mail) > Subject: TR: [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software > > > > Can someone help ? > cu, > O. > -----Message d'origine----- > De : technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org > [mailto:technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org]De la part de Rudinei Goularte > Envoye : lundi 4 juin 2001 19:24 > A : technotes@lists.m4if.org > Objet : [M4IF Technotes] mpeg-4 referece software > > > Hi all! > > I've tried to compile the IM1Player (core) released by ISO as the > MPEG-4 reference software at: > http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2489/Ittf_Home/PubliclyAvai > lableStandards.htm/ > > (look for 14496-5). > > I'm using Microsoft Visual C ++ v. 5.0 under Windows 98. > > The problem is that the compiler returns errors (see below). Fixing (I > think) some parts of the code I found that some methods are not > implemented. Is it true? I have to "fill in the blanks"? Or have ISO > relesead a wrong version? > Can someone help-me? > > Thanks in advance. > > Rudinei. > > " > DMIFClientFilter.cpp > ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator > defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or > there is no acceptable conversion) > FlexDmux.cpp > ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator > defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or > there is no acceptable conversion) > MyChannel.cpp > ..\..\Include\ztl.h(233) : error C2678: binary '==' : no operator > defined which takes a left-hand operand of type 'struct McteSlot' (or > there is no acceptable conversion) > Error executing cl.exe. > " > > > _______________________________________________ > Technotes mailing list > Technotes@lists.m4if.org > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes From Jani.Huoponen@hantro.com Mon Jun 11 00:21:05 2001 Received: from hantrodom5.hantro.com (h133.hantro.com [62.236.81.133] (may be forged)) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5B4L5C15374 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:21:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by HANTRODOM5 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:18:29 +0300 Message-ID: From: Jani Huoponen To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:18:21 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi all, There seems to be one vague point in the Visual standard regarding the AC prediction, I would like to have your opinion on the interpretation of the standard. So the question is: What values are supposed to use in ac prediction if type of the prediction block (block 'A' or block 'C') is not intra? Standard does not seem to impose any restrictions on usage of inter blocks as ac predictor blocks but video verification model seems to specify that they should be handled the same way as blocks outside the VOP or video packet (i.e. use zero values as predictors instead of actual inter block ac coefficient values). BR, Jani ------------------------------------------------------------ Jani Huoponen Engineering Manager, System Design Hantro Products Oy Nahkatehtaankatu 2, 90100 Oulu, Finland +358-40-5272676 ------------------------------------------------------------ From ramki@emuzed.com Mon Jun 11 08:21:50 2001 Received: from emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com (emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com [161.58.152.119]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5BCLoC28105 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ramki ([202.9.170.21]) by emuzed.temp.veriohosting.com (8.11.2) id f5BCLi085335; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 06:21:45 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <035b01c0f270$fd67c870$0d0aa8c0@blr.emuzed.com> From: "Ramkishor Korada" To: "Jani Huoponen" , References: Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:51:03 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, When the block is not Intra (Inter), then they should be handled the same way as blocks outside VOP or packet i.e., use zero values as predictors. warm regards, ramkishor Architect - Video Digital Media Technology Division Emuzed Bangalore Division IndiraNagar,Bangalore www.emuzed.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jani Huoponen" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:48 AM Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction > Hi all, > > There seems to be one vague point in the Visual standard regarding the AC > prediction, I would like to have your opinion on the interpretation of the > standard. > > So the question is: > > What values are supposed to use in ac prediction if type of the prediction > block (block 'A' or block 'C') is not intra? Standard does not seem to > impose any restrictions on usage of inter blocks as ac predictor blocks but > video verification model seems to specify that they should be handled the > same way as blocks outside the VOP or video packet (i.e. use zero values as > predictors instead of actual inter block ac coefficient values). > > BR, Jani > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Jani Huoponen > Engineering Manager, System Design > Hantro Products Oy > Nahkatehtaankatu 2, 90100 Oulu, Finland > +358-40-5272676 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Technotes mailing list > Technotes@lists.m4if.org > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes > From HerpelC@thmulti.com Mon Jun 11 10:32:35 2001 Received: from ns2.thmulti.com (dmzraw2.thmulti.com [141.11.234.68]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5BEWYC09959 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:32:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from parexch3.paris.thmulti.com ([141.11.194.5]) by ns2.thmulti.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA16791 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:32:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by parexch3 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:32:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2CEEE9E85750D2119F4000805F317288DD8316@hanexch1.hanover.thmulti.com> From: Herpel Carsten To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:01:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: The issue is: If this cannot be read unambiguously from the spec, a Corrigendum should be made to remove this ambiguity. Is it ambiguous from the written spec? Regards, Carsten +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | THOMSON multimedia -------------------------- CR Hannover | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Carsten Herpel | | Deutsche Thomson-Brandt GmbH | | Karl-Wiechert-Allee 74 Tel.: +49 511 418 2510 | | 30625 Hannover Fax.: +49 511 418 2483 | | Germany mailto:herpelc@thmulti.com | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ -----Original Message----- From: Ramkishor Korada [mailto:ramki@emuzed.com] Sent: 11 June, 2001 14:21 To: Jani Huoponen; technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction Hi, When the block is not Intra (Inter), then they should be handled the same way as blocks outside VOP or packet i.e., use zero values as predictors. warm regards, ramkishor Architect - Video Digital Media Technology Division Emuzed Bangalore Division IndiraNagar,Bangalore www.emuzed.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jani Huoponen" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:48 AM Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction > Hi all, > > There seems to be one vague point in the Visual standard regarding the AC > prediction, I would like to have your opinion on the interpretation of the > standard. > > So the question is: > > What values are supposed to use in ac prediction if type of the prediction > block (block 'A' or block 'C') is not intra? Standard does not seem to > impose any restrictions on usage of inter blocks as ac predictor blocks but > video verification model seems to specify that they should be handled the > same way as blocks outside the VOP or video packet (i.e. use zero values as > predictors instead of actual inter block ac coefficient values). > > BR, Jani > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Jani Huoponen > Engineering Manager, System Design > Hantro Products Oy > Nahkatehtaankatu 2, 90100 Oulu, Finland > +358-40-5272676 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Technotes mailing list > Technotes@lists.m4if.org > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes > _______________________________________________ Technotes mailing list Technotes@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes From pertti.lihavainen@hulikakku.suomi.net Wed Jun 20 07:38:46 2001 Received: from verkko.suomi.net (sun250-0-admin.suomi.net [212.50.140.140]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5KBcjW17944 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:38:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lihiscbuilder5 (hulikakku9.suomi.net) by verkko.suomi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.05.24.18.28.p7) with SMTP id <0GF8007098413Y@verkko.suomi.net> for technotes@lists.m4if.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:33:50 +0300 (EET DST) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:36:47 +0100 From: Pertti Lihavainen To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Message-id: <002f01c0f98e$18ac2120$090b000a@suomi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0024_01C0F996.71190690" X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 X-Priority: 3 Subject: [M4IF Technotes] subscribed Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C0F996.71190690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subscribed pertti.lihavainen@hulikakku.suomi.net ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C0F996.71190690 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subscribed
 
pertti.lihavainen@h= ulikakku.suomi.net
------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C0F996.71190690-- From bj@sasken.com Fri Jun 22 09:30:24 2001 Received: from samar.sasken.com (samar.sasken.com [164.164.56.2]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5MDUKQ06477 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:30:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from samar (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by samar.sasken.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5MDU0t03702 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:00:10 +0530 (IST) Received: from localhost (bj@localhost) by sunms2.sasken.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA29923 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:59:57 +0530 (IST) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:59:57 +0530 (IST) From: B Jagadeesh To: In-Reply-To: <035b01c0f270$fd67c870$0d0aa8c0@blr.emuzed.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [M4IF Technotes] GOV header for enhancement layer Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Dear All, Group of VOP (GOV) header is optional as per the MPEG-4 visual standard. In the case of temporal scalability, if an encoder decides to have a GOV header in the base layer, should the GOV header be present in the corresponding enhancement layer bit stream also? Can GOV header be present in the enhancement layer bit stream? Is it allowed as per MPEG-4 Visual standard? If base layer has GOV header and enhancement layer does not, then calculation of the Composition Time Stamp (CTS) for an enhancement layer VOP will depend on CTS of the Base layer VOPs. I request experts to comment on this. regards, B. Jagadeesh, Ph.D., Sasken Communication technologies Limited, Bangalore, Inida. From Jani.Huoponen@hantro.com Tue Jun 26 01:25:11 2001 Received: from hantrodom5.hantro.com (mx.hantro.com [62.236.81.133]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5Q5PBm02004 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:25:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by HANTRODOM5 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:22:20 +0300 Message-ID: From: Jani Huoponen To: Herpel Carsten , technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:22:20 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx3.magma.ca id f5Q5PBm02004 Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, Actually, this issue is not ambigous in the Visual standard, it does not say that you should treat inter blocks any differently from intra blocks. However, the video verification model document describes it other way, i.e., inter blocks should be treated as blocks outside of VOP or video packet (as Ramkishor says below). This interpretation seems to be quite common and if this is the way to do it then there should be a Corrigendum for it. Otherwise the Video Verification Model doc should be corrected to match the actual Visual standard. Which way to go? br, Jani > -----Original Message----- > From: Herpel Carsten [mailto:HerpelC@thmulti.com] > Sent: 11. kesäkuuta 2001 17:01 > To: technotes@lists.m4if.org > Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction > > > The issue is: If this cannot be read unambiguously from the spec, a > Corrigendum should be made to remove this ambiguity. > > Is it ambiguous from the written spec? > > Regards, > Carsten > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ > | THOMSON multimedia -------------------------- CR Hannover | > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ > | Carsten Herpel | > | Deutsche Thomson-Brandt GmbH | > | Karl-Wiechert-Allee 74 Tel.: +49 511 418 2510 | > | 30625 Hannover Fax.: +49 511 418 2483 | > | Germany mailto:herpelc@thmulti.com | > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ramkishor Korada [mailto:ramki@emuzed.com] > Sent: 11 June, 2001 14:21 > To: Jani Huoponen; technotes@lists.m4if.org > Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction > > > Hi, > When the block is not Intra (Inter), then they should be > handled the same > way as blocks outside VOP or packet i.e., use zero values as > predictors. > > warm regards, > ramkishor > > Architect - Video > Digital Media Technology Division > Emuzed Bangalore Division > IndiraNagar,Bangalore > www.emuzed.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jani Huoponen" > To: > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:48 AM > Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Ac prediction > > > > Hi all, > > > > There seems to be one vague point in the Visual standard > regarding the AC > > prediction, I would like to have your opinion on the > interpretation of the > > standard. > > > > So the question is: > > > > What values are supposed to use in ac prediction if type of > the prediction > > block (block 'A' or block 'C') is not intra? Standard does > not seem to > > impose any restrictions on usage of inter blocks as ac > predictor blocks > but > > video verification model seems to specify that they should > be handled the > > same way as blocks outside the VOP or video packet (i.e. > use zero values > as > > predictors instead of actual inter block ac coefficient values). > > > > BR, Jani > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Jani Huoponen > > Engineering Manager, System Design > > Hantro Products Oy > > Nahkatehtaankatu 2, 90100 Oulu, Finland > > +358-40-5272676 > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Technotes mailing list > > Technotes@lists.m4if.org > > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes > > > > _______________________________________________ > Technotes mailing list > Technotes@lists.m4if.org > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes > _______________________________________________ > Technotes mailing list > Technotes@lists.m4if.org > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes > From axel.binder@philips.com Mon Jul 9 04:00:21 2001 Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6980Lr06294; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:00:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id KAA16199; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:19 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from axel.binder@philips.com) From: axel.binder@philips.com Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com(130.139.36.22) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma016191; Mon, 9 Jul 01 10:00:19 +0200 Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id KAA09318; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10]) by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id KAA12510; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from EMAUO01.diamond.philips.com (emauo01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.215]) by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id JAA11592; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:59:03 +0200 (MET DST) To: infolist@lists.m4if.org, technotes@lists.m4if.org Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:59:23 +0200 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on EMAUO01/H/SERVER/PHILIPS(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 09/07/2001 10:13:14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4 Question about alpha values Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, I found several places where alpha values are calculated for gray level shapes and during BIFS lighting. However, I couldn't find any place where these values (from the frame buffer, composed scene) are used again. Did I miss something or are the calculations of the destination alpha values obsolete? Thanks in advance Axel ===================================================== Axel Binder Philips Starnberg Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17 D-82319 Starnberg phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany fax: +49 8151 270 200 mobile: +49 172 92 18 623 e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com ===================================================== From axel.binder@philips.com Mon Jul 9 04:28:38 2001 Received: from regent.netkonect.net (regent.netkonect.net [194.62.44.60]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f698Scr08955; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:28:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pathe1.ace-internet.co.uk ([194.164.150.69]) by regent.netkonect.net (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f698Sq813388; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:28:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from pathe1.ace-internet.co.uk (BRITISHPATHE01 [10.0.0.2]) by pathe1.ace-internet.co.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id LP3ZF79C; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:33:21 +0100 Received: by pathe1.ace-internet.co.uk (Microsoft Exchange Connector for POP3 Mailboxes 4.50.2113) with SMTP (Global POP3 Download) id MSG07092001-093105-6601.MMD@BRITISHPATHE01; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:31:06 +0100 Received: from megadodo.segNET.COM (megadodo.segNET.COM [206.34.181.3]) by ns.aceinternet.co.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f698Clw05405 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:12:48 +0100 Received: from mx3.magma.ca (mx3.magma.ca [206.191.0.251]) by megadodo.segNET.COM (8.9.1a/8.8.5a) with ESMTP id EAA09914; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:04:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx3.magma.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6984Hr06682; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:04:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6980Lr06294; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:00:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id KAA16199; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:19 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from axel.binder@philips.com) From: axel.binder@philips.com Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com(130.139.36.22) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma016191; Mon, 9 Jul 01 10:00:19 +0200 Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id KAA09318; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10]) by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id KAA12510; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from EMAUO01.diamond.philips.com (emauo01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.215]) by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id JAA11592; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:59:03 +0200 (MET DST) To: infolist@lists.m4if.org, technotes@lists.m4if.org Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on EMAUO01/H/SERVER/PHILIPS(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 09/07/2001 10:13:14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: infolist@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:59:23 +0200 X-UIDL: 0a'!!B+,!!HYA"!pbT"! Subject: [M4IF Technotes] [M4IF Infolist] MPEG-4 Question about alpha values Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, I found several places where alpha values are calculated for gray level shapes and during BIFS lighting. However, I couldn't find any place where these values (from the frame buffer, composed scene) are used again. Did I miss something or are the calculations of the destination alpha values obsolete? Thanks in advance Axel ===================================================== Axel Binder Philips Starnberg Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17 D-82319 Starnberg phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany fax: +49 8151 270 200 mobile: +49 172 92 18 623 e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com ===================================================== _______________________________________________ M4IF General Information list Infolist@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/infolist From renaud@envivio.com Mon Jul 9 04:34:59 2001 Received: from jupiter.rennes.envivio.com (france.envivio.com [195.101.247.161]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f698Yxr09578 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:34:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from envivio.com (dynhost107.rennes.envivio.com [192.168.105.107]) by jupiter.rennes.envivio.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id KAA30929; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:34:51 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: jupiter.rennes.envivio.com: Host dynhost107.rennes.envivio.com [192.168.105.107] claimed to be envivio.com Message-ID: <3B496D71.72848CE5@envivio.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 10:38:09 +0200 From: Renaud Cazoulat Organization: Envivio France X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axel.binder@philips.com CC: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] MPEG-4 Question about alpha values References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, You probably should have a look to the VRML documentation (a good start is http://www.best.com/~rikk/Book/) Renaud Envivio axel.binder@philips.com wrote: > Hi, > > I found several places where alpha values are calculated > for gray level shapes and during BIFS lighting. However, > I couldn't find any place where these values (from the frame > buffer, composed scene) are used again. Did I miss something > or are the calculations of the destination alpha values > obsolete? From axel.binder@philips.com Tue Jul 10 11:24:07 2001 Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6AFO6r01791 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:24:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id RAA15600 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:24:05 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from axel.binder@philips.com) From: axel.binder@philips.com Received: from smtpscan-nl3.philips.com(130.139.36.23) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma015598; Tue, 10 Jul 01 17:24:05 +0200 Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA15836 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:24:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10]) by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA28900 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:24:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from EMAUO01.diamond.philips.com (emauo01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.215]) by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA16724 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:23:33 +0200 (MET DST) To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:23:58 +0200 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on EMAUO01/H/SERVER/PHILIPS(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 10/07/2001 17:37:46 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, can anybody tell me for which visual profiles the "overlapped motion compensation"-tool (OBMC) is employed? Due to the profile overview in the standard it's never used. In some requirement document I found it was proposed for Main profile. thanks beforehand axel ===================================================== Axel Binder Philips Starnberg Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17 D-82319 Starnberg phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany fax: +49 8151 270 200 mobile: +49 172 92 18 623 e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com ===================================================== From fp@lx.it.pt Tue Jul 10 12:03:20 2001 Received: from cascais.lx.it.pt (cascais.lx.it.pt [193.136.221.1]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6AG3Gr05724 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:03:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from amalia.img.lx.it.pt (amalia.img.lx.it.pt [193.136.222.20]) by cascais.lx.it.pt (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6AGs1d17549; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:54:02 GMT Received: from lx.it.pt (neptuno [193.136.222.28]) by amalia.img.lx.it.pt (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA10078; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:02:28 GMT Message-ID: <3B4B2785.87B58316@lx.it.pt> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:04:21 +0100 From: Fernando Pereira X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axel.binder@philips.com, technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: Re: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi ! axel.binder@philips.com wrote: > > Hi, > > can anybody tell me for which visual profiles the > "overlapped motion compensation"-tool (OBMC) is employed? > > Due to the profile overview in the standard it's never > used. In some requirement document I found it was proposed for > Main profile. Until now, the OBMC has not been include in any visual object type and consequently in no visual profile. Regards Fernando -- Fernando Manuel Bernardo Pereira, Ph.D., Professor Instituto Superior Técnico - Instituto de Telecomunicações Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, PORTUGAL Phone: + 351 21 8418460 Fax: + 351 21 8418472 E-mail: Fernando.Pereira@lx.it.pt WWW: http://www.img.lx.it.pt/~fp/ From hagai@enquad.com Tue Jul 10 12:36:48 2001 Received: from balder.inter.net.il (balder.inter.net.il [192.114.186.15]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6AGamr08822 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:36:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from HAGAI ([192.117.158.7]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id ATI39783; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:36:39 +0300 (IDT) Message-ID: <037301c10966$7d077740$0601a8c0@HAGAI> From: "Hagai Folkman" To: "tech notes M4IF" Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:33:52 +0200 Organization: EnQuad Technologies MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0370_01C10977.401C28B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Subject: [M4IF Technotes] GMC supported at core-profile ? Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0370_01C10977.401C28B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, can anybody tell me if core-profile support Global Motion Compensation = (GMC) tool ? I know that Advanced Simple Profile support this tool. thanks, hagai ------=_NextPart_000_0370_01C10977.401C28B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

can anybody tell me if = core-profile=20 support Global Motion Compensation (GMC) tool ?
 
I know that Advanced Simple Profile = support this=20 tool.
 
thanks,
   =20 hagai
------=_NextPart_000_0370_01C10977.401C28B0-- From rkoenen@intertrust.com Tue Jul 10 12:42:03 2001 Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.163.3]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6AGg3r09336 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:42:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id JAA03283 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown(198.3.162.27) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (V5.5) id xma002962; Tue, 10 Jul 01 09:40:59 -0700 Received: from exchange.epr.com (exchange.epr.com [198.3.162.249]) by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA07821; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by exchange.epr.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:38:46 -0700 Message-ID: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B02DEB9DF@exchange.epr.com> From: Rob Koenen To: "'Hagai Folkman'" , tech notes M4IF Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] GMC supported at core-profile ? Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:38:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1095E.C92AB680" Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1095E.C92AB680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" It is not in Core. It is in Advnaced Simple and Advanced Coding Efficiency (ACE) Rob -----Original Message----- From: Hagai Folkman [mailto:hagai@enquad.com] Sent: Tuesday, 10 July, 2001 10:34 To: tech notes M4IF Subject: [M4IF Technotes] GMC supported at core-profile ? Hi, can anybody tell me if core-profile support Global Motion Compensation (GMC) tool ? I know that Advanced Simple Profile support this tool. thanks, hagai ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1095E.C92AB680 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1255"
It is not in Core.
It is in Advnaced Simple and Advanced Coding Efficiency (ACE)
 
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Hagai Folkman [mailto:hagai@enquad.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 July, 2001 10:34
To: tech notes M4IF
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] GMC supported at core-profile ?

Hi,

can anybody tell me if core-profile support Global Motion Compensation (GMC) tool ?
 
I know that Advanced Simple Profile support this tool.
 
thanks,
    hagai
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1095E.C92AB680-- From garysull@microsoft.com Tue Jul 10 14:47:38 2001 Received: from mail5.microsoft.com (mail5.microsoft.com [131.107.3.121]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f6AIlcr21255 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 157.54.9.100 by mail5.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:30:45 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Received: from red-msg-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.70]) by inet-imc-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:29:57 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:29:57 -0700 Message-ID: <0170DDAD0BADFA4CBEC3B55A0748DCCC040C17AD@red-msg-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Thread-Index: AcEJVPw0yPCNKislQuK9brShbNRSEgAGIc2Q From: "Gary Sullivan" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jul 2001 18:29:57.0426 (UTC) FILETIME=[52430120:01C1096E] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx3.magma.ca id f6AIlcr21255 Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Axel, You're right. None of the MPEG-4 profiles use OBMC. That's unfortunate, because it's a good tool (although my opinion is biased). It's odd that some publications talk about OBMC as being a feature of MPEG-4. As things stand, it really isn't used in that standard. Best Regards, -Gary S. -----Original Message----- From: axel.binder@philips.com [mailto:axel.binder@philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:24 AM To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Hi, can anybody tell me for which visual profiles the "overlapped motion compensation"-tool (OBMC) is employed? Due to the profile overview in the standard it's never used. In some requirement document I found it was proposed for Main profile. thanks beforehand axel ===================================================== Axel Binder Philips Starnberg Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17 D-82319 Starnberg phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany fax: +49 8151 270 200 mobile: +49 172 92 18 623 e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com ===================================================== _______________________________________________ Technotes mailing list Technotes@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes From peterh@videospheres.com Tue Jul 10 15:03:10 2001 Received: from mx2.magma.ca (mx2.magma.ca [206.191.0.250]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6AJ3Ar22820 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:03:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail3.magma.ca (mail3.magma.ca [206.191.0.221]) by mx2.magma.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20782; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:03:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from OREOV2 (gate.intouchsurvey.com [206.191.25.226]) by mail3.magma.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA02851; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:03:09 -0400 (EDT) From: "Peter Haighton" To: "Gary Sullivan" , , Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:04:24 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <0170DDAD0BADFA4CBEC3B55A0748DCCC040C17AD@red-msg-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi All, Yes, OBMC is a strange thing. Since it is described quite well in the standard, it is kind of odd that it never got put into any profile. Its a tool with no home! Which leads to the question, should it be removed from the specification? Peter -- Peter Haighton VideoSpheres Inc. 329 March Road, Unit 109 Kanata, Ontario Canada, K2K 2E9 Tel: (613) 270-9646 x240 Fax: (613) 271-1896 email: peterh@VideoSpheres.com See http://www.m4if.org for the latest on MPEG-4 -----Original Message----- From: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org [mailto:technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org]On Behalf Of Gary Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:30 PM To: axel.binder@philips.com; technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Axel, You're right. None of the MPEG-4 profiles use OBMC. That's unfortunate, because it's a good tool (although my opinion is biased). It's odd that some publications talk about OBMC as being a feature of MPEG-4. As things stand, it really isn't used in that standard. Best Regards, -Gary S. -----Original Message----- From: axel.binder@philips.com [mailto:axel.binder@philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:24 AM To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Hi, can anybody tell me for which visual profiles the "overlapped motion compensation"-tool (OBMC) is employed? Due to the profile overview in the standard it's never used. In some requirement document I found it was proposed for Main profile. thanks beforehand axel ===================================================== Axel Binder Philips Starnberg Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17 D-82319 Starnberg phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany fax: +49 8151 270 200 mobile: +49 172 92 18 623 e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com ===================================================== _______________________________________________ Technotes mailing list Technotes@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes _______________________________________________ Technotes mailing list Technotes@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes From rkoenen@intertrust.com Tue Jul 10 15:20:41 2001 Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.163.3]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6AJKer24469 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:20:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id MAA22325 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown(198.3.162.27) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (V5.5) id xma022071; Tue, 10 Jul 01 12:20:06 -0700 Received: from exchange.epr.com (exchange.epr.com [198.3.162.249]) by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18568; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by exchange.epr.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:18:05 -0700 Message-ID: <720AE932C238D411B4D100C04F10DA6B02DEBA05@exchange.epr.com> From: Rob Koenen To: "'Peter Haighton'" , Gary Sullivan , axel.binder@philips.com, technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:18:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > Yes, OBMC is a strange thing. Since it is described quite well in the > standard, it is kind of odd that it never got put into any > profile. Its a > tool with no home! Which leads to the question, should it be > removed from > the specification? M4If is kind of a funny place to discuss this, but the answer is, it *could* theoretically be removed, but IF AND ONLY IF you are sure it will never be used in any future profile. I see no harm in letting it sit there. Rob From garysull@microsoft.com Tue Jul 10 15:46:44 2001 Received: from mail3.microsoft.com (mail3.microsoft.com [131.107.3.123]) by mx3.magma.ca (8.10.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f6AJkir26993 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:46:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 157.54.7.67 by mail3.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:23:20 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Received: from red-msg-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.70]) by inet-imc-04.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:25:36 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:25:52 -0700 Message-ID: <0170DDAD0BADFA4CBEC3B55A0748DCCC040EF302@red-msg-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Thread-Index: AcEJcv5lazbZ0yZ6T8WjCxgJUxptVQAAiiZw From: "Gary Sullivan" To: "Peter Haighton" , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jul 2001 19:25:36.0345 (UTC) FILETIME=[18699C90:01C10976] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx3.magma.ca id f6AJkir26993 Sender: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org Errors-To: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org X-BeenThere: technotes@lists.m4if.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: M4IF Technical Discussions on MPEG-4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Personally, I don't think we should try to remove OBMC from MPEG-4. It takes a lot of work to remove things, and it's possible to introduce errors in the process. And the position of OBMC in the spec isn't really a problem -- it's just an oddity. It's just an opportunity that was passed by -- a useful tool that hasn't yet been used (at least not in MPEG-4). I believe there have been other examples of such things, although I can't think of others in MPEG standards at the moment. There's always the chance it could get picked up in some yet-to-be-defined future profile. Best Regards, -Gary -----Original Message----- From: Peter Haighton [mailto:peterh@videospheres.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:04 PM To: Gary Sullivan; axel.binder@philips.com; technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Hi All, Yes, OBMC is a strange thing. Since it is described quite well in the standard, it is kind of odd that it never got put into any profile. Its a tool with no home! Which leads to the question, should it be removed from the specification? Peter -- Peter Haighton VideoSpheres Inc. 329 March Road, Unit 109 Kanata, Ontario Canada, K2K 2E9 Tel: (613) 270-9646 x240 Fax: (613) 271-1896 email: peterh@VideoSpheres.com See http://www.m4if.org for the latest on MPEG-4 -----Original Message----- From: technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org [mailto:technotes-admin@lists.m4if.org]On Behalf Of Gary Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:30 PM To: axel.binder@philips.com; technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: RE: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Axel, You're right. None of the MPEG-4 profiles use OBMC. That's unfortunate, because it's a good tool (although my opinion is biased). It's odd that some publications talk about OBMC as being a feature of MPEG-4. As things stand, it really isn't used in that standard. Best Regards, -Gary S. -----Original Message----- From: axel.binder@philips.com [mailto:axel.binder@philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:24 AM To: technotes@lists.m4if.org Subject: [M4IF Technotes] OBMC, for which visual profile Hi, can anybody tell me for which visual profiles the "overlapped motion compensation"-tool (OBMC) is employed? Due to the profile overview in the standard it's never used. In some requirement document I found it was proposed for Main profile. thanks beforehand axel ===================================================== Axel Binder Philips Starnberg Development Manager Software Petersbrunner Str. 17 D-82319 Starnberg phone: +49 8151 270 108 Germany fax: +49 8151 270 200 mobile: +49 172 92 18 623 e-mail: axel.binder@philips.com ===================================================== _______________________________________________ Technotes mailing list Technotes@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes _______________________________________________ Technotes mailing list Technotes@lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/technotes From peterh@videospheres.com Tue Jul 10 15:50:05 2001 Received: from mx1.magmacom.com (mx1.magmacom.com [206.191.0.217]) by